| | I go along with this:
1. The first emphasizes innate biology, which may be encouraged or discouraged during childhood. That is, human sexual development is viewed as a primarily biological process, basically similar across cultures, that follows a relatively narrow model for healthy sexual development and is vulnerable to disturbance from and influence of the larger culture and by other means. This is the approach used most often in the medical study of child development.
Telling them: Newborn infant boys who get an erection during a diaper change are behaving "sexually," would get one laughed out the room.
#2 is disproved by case studies.
|
|
