| | So what if Barbara smokes? If you have a wish to stop smoking and you find help in what she writes, good for you. Having a smoker write on how to quit, rather than a former smoker, may be as silly as having Dr. Phil write a book on how to loose weight, it may undermine the trustworthiness of that work, but letting that affect your opinion about anything but that text is a logical fallacy (argumentum ad hominem) infesting your own premise for rational conclusions.
We don't have to follow people like headless chicken, Barabara has made mistakes, Rand made mistakes, we all make mistakes it is one of the things that makes rational beings better at being rational beings.
Yes! We all judge the writer, it helps us anticipate with what frame of mind, and what kind of attention we should read between the lines. If I look at my little black book then Barbara does have a couple of marks on the minus-side, but as the plus-side seems to take up several pages it doesn't change anything fundamental, except revealing that Barbara too is human, but nobody, but me, are to put marks in my black book.
If Barbara is to stay out of this venue, i don't know how great a loss it will be for her, i do know that it will be a great loss for me.
I appreciate the knowledge i gain from this site, but the noise to signal ratio seems to be getting worse, personal smear campaigns will give no value to anyone, save those that are here to smear objectivism.
Infesting your own premise for rational conclusions is your business, attempting to infest the minds of others is immoral trespassing on intellectual property.
|
|