| | Chris, regarding the flack I mentioned, I received this August 31, 2006:
|  | Ross Jeffries' Persuasion/Seduction Newsletters | |
|
| | | | Luscious Hate Mail..And The Other Side Too! | |
Dear Speed Seduction® Student,
God, I love this job.
I have to confess that pissing people off and rattling their cages is one of my guilty pleasures and pastimes.
If you have a Speed Seduction Home Study Course (http://www.seduction.com/products/rj187.asp)
then you know I can be a snotty, sarcastic, son of a gun. I LIKE getting a "rise" out of people.
So, when I get really luscious hate mail, I've GOT to share it.
Here is a real "slam doozy" to share with you. And no, I am NOT making this up. This is exactly what this guy sent me and I am including the headers so you can see for yourself. I've even left in his spelling errors.
From: Richard m (details deleted)
To: Ross Jeffries yatesj@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: And The Married Woman Said, "My Phone Fell In The Pond!"
"dear ross,
go to hell for going to a married woman. Have you seen the damage done to entire families because some jerk got between the family members. how selfish can anyone be just to get into someones pants. the families are distroyed . there are many single women out there i'll do them the favour and i'll forget the married women. rmember kharma can be hell on earth. besides in this part of the country it could get you shot. RM"
Wow, Rich. I'm sure your double-wide trailer was shaking with rage as you wrote to me.
Let me just say I honor any and all relationships where there is real satisfaction and love.
What destroys families and relationships is hate, possessiveness and fear.
I trust that women, whether single or married, are adult and mature enough to make their own decisions.
Actually, if you read some good books like "A Passion For More" and "The Erotic Silence Of The American Wife" you might see that injecting some passion and life into a woman is something that can, potentially SALVAGE a relationship.
Now, let me be more clear. I'm not even sure I would take this further with this married women because I'm not clear yet that she can handle it.
That's right; I've actually passed up some very juicy,
incredibly hot married women who wanted to get it on precisely because I felt it WOULD ruin their marriage or lead to dangerous and bad consequences for them and myself.
Right now, with this woman, I'm just exploring the potential and possibility.
I'll tell you one final thing: a man who has good communication and who is pleasuring his woman never has to worry if she is going to "cheat". She is either going to stick with him or at least let him know if she's unhappy and something is going on.
On to more mail. Here is a different perspective on the whole boyfriend/husbore destroying theme:
From: Phil To: Ross Jeffries yatesj@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:40 AM
Subject: Thank You for the BF Destroy!
"Ross,
Thank You for putting out the BF Destroyer (BFD) for all mankind to use to help womankind get past their past.
It is a nice tool for me to decide if and when to use it. I have found what you said about WHEN „a woman is truly satisfied and pleased where she is at, with the man she is with, you aren't going to get anywhere, .....‰ to be true. My attempts of the BFD on that woman seems to have the effect of them feeling a challenge to the way they feel about him, and they strongly resist by way of recalling all the delightful-wonderful feelings and thoughts they have about him. What I end up doing is
reinforcing that which I could not do anyway."
Phil,
Spot on. If a woman is happy with her man, you aren't going to get anywhere with any technology. If she isn't happy, why does her man have some unwritten right to hang on to her, no matter what?
People aren't property, even the people we love. We don't own them. They don't own us. End of story.
Here is another perspective:
"From: "Luis "
To: <yatesj@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Yet More On Boyfriend Destroying!
I always say: Just because u have a job it does mean you are not looking. Or just because u are taken it does not mean u are not looking. With that in mind I pursue a woman that I like and who has a boyfriend. I believe that it is the nature of humans to always look for better deals whether with people, things or services.
Bye now."
Luis,
Very true. The other thing that many guys don't is that, at any given time, most attractive women are going to be with someone, or thinking about someone they want to get with or go back to. Very few women are totally clear and freely "single" in the sense of having no romantic connection, whether ongoing or on their mind.
And so, often, the "boyfriend" really is just a place holder
til something and someone better comes along. Or he's ok for most things, but the lovin' sucks so she needs someone to scratch that itch.
We need to get past the hide-bound, conventional notions of "boyfriend/girlfriend, perfect luv, don't break us apart" mindset that is creating incredibly cruel pressures to idealize every possible and every actual connection. It serves NO one.
One more bit of fan mail before we move on:
"Dear Ross
I have had the privilege for some time now to read your
newsletters though I must be frank and tell you that I still haven't gotten around to purchase any of your products yet which I plan to by the way.
On the matter of boyfriend destroyers I would like to say to " the Preacher /Anon " you responded to in your newsletter that you might do well in growing up and realize the fact that:
Women - today - are at the deepest most fundamental level a product of millions of years of evolution where men were either tough-moral depraved-sons of bitches fighting for survival and to protect the family around the clock or dead.
And Mr. Preacher - though I know that you are a sweet, romantic guy and that girls couldn't be better off with anyone than you that does not change the fact that only a friggin' snap of the fingers and the caveman will activate powers so deeply embedded in your woman and of such incomprehensible magnitude that in spite of all her love for you her nu-nu is now his possession only because that's his will. - And there ARE cave-men out there!
Therefore Mr. Preacher my advice for you is as I mentioned to grow up
Only raw seduction power with good intention towards yourself and your target matters. Become a master of this art so that when you find a woman you want to make yours for life you know about every shitty-dirty-nasty trick - and they are many and they are gruesome (Mr. Jeffries i a Sunday school-boy by comparison if you insist on addressing the ethics that is) and so may stand a chance to fight all the other ass-holes off.
That's all Preacher. May Athena be with you, always.
David, Student, Denmark"
Wow. Thanks Dave. I couldn't have said it better myself. Although I don't agree that we have to be "cavemen". To be scientifically accurate, we have no idea what the mating rituals were like for our genetic ancestors. They didn't exactly leave diaries.
Too many people substitute Hollywood imagery for science, and that too is a huge intellectual mistake.
Further, there is tons of actual evidence that "co-operation" is as much a part of survival as competition. Neo-Darwinism is on the outs, as more and more we realize it is the fittest GROUPS that survive. Fit groups MUST exercise "co-operation".
For more on this, I can't recommend highly enough an amazing book called "The Biology of Belief" by Bruce Lipton. He is the Ross Jeffries of biology!
Anyway:
What we can observe, without speculation or fantasy, is that women (and indeed, men too, all humans) respond positively to strong leadership and strong intent, properly presented.
I'll close by giving you a brief anecdote. The other day, I was exchanging pleasantries with a counter-girl at a local
restaurant, and she was beaming.
I said to her, "Why are you so happy?
She said, "because you are just so NICE to me, whenever I see you".
I very gently corrected her. "I'm not "nice". Nice is weak. I'm "pleasant". "Pleasant" is power, held in proper restraint, and exercised with precision."
She actually shuddered with pleasure at that point and I saw her face go "doggy dinner bowl". In fact, I could almost smell panty-moisture forming!
"Wow", she said all dreamy-like. "I LIIIIKE that!"
That's all for today, both Ross bashers and Ross lovers. I enjoy both groups. It's the "lukewarmers" I can't stand.
Piece and peace,
RJ
P.S. For keys on developing a powerful presence that is also pleasant, and taking on the practices, beliefs and energies that really draw in women, check out my very controversial Magick/Psychic Influence Course:
http://www.seduction.com/products/rj170.asp
Yes, I already know I am going to hell, in league with Stan, the Deevil, Baalbeezulbob, etc etc etc. My born again brothers, Alan and Steve, have made that VERY clear to me, and I'm sure old Scratch can't wait to get his thermonuclear mitts on my sac for eternity. So y'all who want to preach to me, just open up another quart of white-lightning moonshine and dance around your
double-wide til the welfare check comes, ok?
For those of you who want to open your mind and LEARN some kick-ass skills, I really recommend the Magick/PI course.
P.P.S. Ironically, born-again Steve says that born-again Alan is ALSO going straight to hell because he (Alan) doesn't believe in the right way and to the right extent. Can you believe all this judgment from followers of a guy who gave strict orders NEVER to judge?
| |
| |
|
 | This newsletter, and all of its contents are copyright 2004, Ross Jeffries. However this newsletter may be reprinted and re-used in any format, without prior consent, provided all content, including all links, are kept intact, proper credit for authorship is given, and the newsletter is given for free, without charge.
|
|
|
|
|
(Edited by Luke Setzer on 9/27, 1:14pm)
|
|
A 'nice' man only knows how to be agreeable. He doesn't know how to challenge women and he can't or won't set the lead. And he filters everything he says through the belief that women are fragile little flowers who need to handled with OH so much care lest they be broken. YUUCH. One more thing: women don't trust his communication because he just won't dare say anything that might offend them. Now a pleasant man is something quite different: pleasant is power, held in proper restraint and exercised with precision and elegance. A pleasant man will speak his mind, set the lead, but he also knows how to listen and show the proper degree of interest and respect. He may put himself first, but he also genuinely cares for and cares about his woman (or women). They are of great importance to him as long as they treat him right and work within the rules that he has made very clear. Most important: his world is his own. He never, NEVER makes the WOMAN his world, around which he orbits. He does allow her to come into his world and occasionally even be at the center WITH him.
