| | Deleted the objectionable posts -- I'm willing to abide by community standards on what is considered inside the acceptable envelope for this site. If I missed any that should come down, please say so.
Mike Erickson -- I think a more accurate description is that I'm considerably more jaded when it comes to erotic images than some people here -- and that I'm used to a far raunchier crowd at Reason.com's Hit 'N Run.
Re this: You must have a very mild porn collection, Ed. Only Jim actually linked to porn, (he can delete the google link) and he may not have realized it, although it was pointed out to him.
I thought Ted was using humorous hyperbole when he first described the google links as porn -- my definition of porn includes this caveat "if you can find it on Google, it ain't really porn" -- but after taking another look I saw a few pics that could offend the easily shocked.
I think my list of favorites on xvideos.com would shock the hell out of Ed. But it is touching and heart-warming to see such innocence in this brassy, bold, uncouth modern age. ;)
Anyway, as the house libertine, let me offer an apology / mea culpa for any offense I caused.
And thanks to the couple of people who sanctioned the pics that I briefly put up. ;)
|
|
