Something New about Ayn Rand!

Jason, regarding post #36 - you have an elegant way of making your point. Thanks for the link.

:)
John

Post 41

Thursday, April 21, 2005 - 7:52pm

Who is the real life Roark and Galt? Who is the man of the highest mind or intelligence level? Was Ayn writing about an alien creature? Is it true that the Ayn readers still do not know about the axiom that existence exists and that A is A! Are you people unhappy with your present life so that you fear coming back on this earth [if your genes ever leave the earth in the first place!]

wow man, this is deep shit..... aliens and afterlife.....kewl..... and another hit off the bong. (*cough*)

Post 42

Friday, April 22, 2005 - 2:10am

Hello Everybody,
                           Two corrections to my 2nd post -
     Ayn wrote in Atlas that - 'John Galt is Prometheus who changed his mind.After centuries
of being torn by vultures for having brought to men the fire of gods,he has decided to
withdraw his fire until the day when men withdraw their vultures!'

    'Refused to enter Europe again after what was done to him in Greece.' The word 'enter' was missing.

        My English is one version higher than the American one!Obviously it requires a deeper
understanding of Ayn Rand to understand my kind of English!

        So what I am doing today?
                      I am rekindling the fire again and this time I intend to reach the entire
mankind!

Post 43

Friday, April 22, 2005 - 2:31am

       Hello Everybody,
                                  Ayn's writing was about man worship and the best example of that
is Krishna worship!Ayn desperately needs Krishna but it is not the other way around.Why?
Because Roark does not need Ayn.And Ayn wrote about Roark.
                                 By the way,aliens was a concept invented by Americans!Not my fault!
And who is talking about after life? Existence exists.A is A.Big bang theory of the universe
is right.And that is enough to explain the eternal existence of man!
                    You are here today.And so you grasp your existence.When you die after your
100 years you will not be there to notice your non-existence.But your genes will continue
to exist in the human gene pool which is the human population!A single man and woman in
principle can give birth to the entire human race if they were to visit the maternity ward for
10 billion times!

                    You must have studied in kindergarten -
            A for Apple, B for Bat and C for Cat! I am not interested in that anymore!
     If you still want an explanation for rebirth of the individuals then you may visit -
             http://www.krishna.com   and read the section on reincarnation!
     They say some very simple and sensible things which even you can understand!

Post 44

Friday, April 22, 2005 - 2:42am

     Hello Everbody,
                              Jason has a provided a link in post 36 about me!
       Well,it is too early for you people to see my face.But you can certainly see the picture
of krishna if you visit the links which I have provided in my first post!

Post 45

Friday, April 22, 2005 - 4:13am

Hello Everybody,
                           For some basic fundamentals please visit the following -
    http://aynrand.meetup.com/21/boards/view/viewthread?thread=878787&listpage=20

    http://aynrand.meetup.com/boards/view/viewthread?thread=1131152

    http://aynrand.meetup.com/boards/view/viewthread?thread=1145446

Post 46

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 4:11am

Hello Everybody,
Ok, I apologize!
But how can I apologize for my nature and identity!I intend to be like that only!

Post 47

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 12:39pm

OK Luke, after reading what MK had to say, is world domination by used-car salesmanship really worth it?

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul...and gain it again... and lose it again ...and gain it again... and lose it again ..........

:-)

Post 48

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 1:35pm

My English is one version higher than the American one!

Whoah, you've got version 2.0!? How is it? Did they fix the bug where it crashes when you use a sextuple negative?

Post 49

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 2:29pm

Hey Murugan,

You started this thread off and - until now - have logged in 8 posts. I still can't figure out what the hell you are talking about. Or even if you speak English well enough to say.

But you sure are a busy little sucker, aren't you?

//;-)

Michael

Post 50

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 4:14pm

Murugan,

Reality Check:

Definition: Mysticism -
A belief in the existence of realities beyond perceptual or intellectual apprehension that are central to being and directly accessible by subjective experience.

Mystical ideas are ones that are not based on anything. Its like having the idea "Unicorns exist." Or the idea "I rode a unicorn yesterday, but I just can't remember it, and I have nothing to prove that I actually rode a unicorn yesterday."

How about this Krishna, lets make a deal.
- You show reasonable evidence supporting the idea "re-incarnation is true", and I will give up my membership at solohq.com, and give you $1000USD.
- You fail to show reasonable evidence supporting the idea "re-incarnation is true", and you either stop believing "re-incarnation is true" OR you never post again about anything related to re-incarnation (unless it is evidence that reasonably supports re-incarnation).

Post 51

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 6:23pm

Whoah, you've got version 2.0!? How is it? Did they fix the bug where it crashes when you use a sextuple negative?

I'm just hoping that the new version introduces a few more disambiguation symbols. Like those handy parentheses we get in mathematics to make sure an equation means exactly what we want it to mean.

You know, like:

I saw the man on (the hill with the telescope).
I saw (the man on the hill) with the telescope.

Post 52

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 7:09pm

Nature Leseul: Exelent idia. I hav used thaet methud maeself, espeshelly when I hav e lat av ANDs aend ORs en e sentens. Ai wuld also lik et ef tha keracters en tha wurds en Englesh fallowd ruls, so that ich keracter wuld hav wun saownd aend only yuse thaet saownd when pronawnsd.

No wonder people say English is one of the most difficult languages to learn!
(Edited by Dean Michael Gores
on 4/25, 7:14pm)

Post 53

Monday, April 25, 2005 - 9:16pm

Ai wuld also lik et ef tha keracters en tha wurds en Englesh fallowd ruls, so that ich keracter wuld hav wun saownd aend only yuse thaet saownd when pronawnsd.

I hear there are a phew filosofers who concur with this sentiment.

Post 54

Tuesday, April 26, 2005 - 1:08pm

oh multiverse confusion
of hare krishna tedia
and 'pedia galactica,
thou comst to a place
where gods hath no ace
and members shall lace, thy tibia!

PS:

english becoming V 3
or it be cumming e.e?

Post 55

Tuesday, April 26, 2005 - 6:10am

Hello Dean,
Make that USD2O,OOO[20 of you can come to together to argue with me!] and you can keep your membership at Solo!
Is that Ok?

Post 56

Tuesday, April 26, 2005 - 6:17am

Hello Dean,
                  When you walk past a lady on a street whom you have never seen before
and she beams at you and makes some gesture pointing at her breasts
                  then you go ahead and place your one hand on one of her breasts and see if
you don't get slapped no matter how good looking you are?
                  I never got slapped to this day by a woman!
                                                             Thank you!

Post 57

Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 9:01pm

Hello Num++,
What do you mean by used-car salesmanship?If the world had belonged to
Roark then he would have designed 16,108 buildings in his lifetime!So would you call him as used-car salesmanship in his next birth?And to whom does the world belong today?
Please name one individual or any nation.Have you understood Atlas Shrugged by Ayn?

You want back the likes of Christ and Hitler?I am sorry,but they will not be
permitted anymore!It is too late for them now!

Post 58

Thursday, April 28, 2005 - 9:03pm

Hello Dean and others,
Do you still want any further proofs
for re-incarnation?When I walk on the streets of Mumbai
I occasionally see an american,german or french girl who looks at me because i am the krishna.I don't wonder how
they got to know about Krishna.He is supposed to be the most famous individual on this planet!Check facts of reality
and give up mysticism completely!That much is expected
from Ayn Rand readers.
By the way,have you seen shades of krishna in the character of
Leo in We The Living.No he is not the highest man but you think
Ayn is innocent!Are you underestimating her?Oh,Lord!

Post 59

Thursday, April 28, 2005 - 9:53pm