About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Forward one pageLast Page


Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 60

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 8:05amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
MSK: No fair! My 15 word post is the absolute triumph of quality over quantity! But aren't you engaging in argumenta ad numberum? (Or is that argumentum ad numbera--or numberums??)?

--Brant


Post 61

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 9:04amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nathan,

Perhaps I am wrong, maybe it's a messiah complex.


Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Post 62

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 12:01pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
MSK: Aren't you just trying to get Nathan to shut up? Here's how I'd do it: "Nathan, if you don't shut up your hair will fall out!" But I'm not trying to do that. Nevertheless, let all be warned of my abilities!

--Brant
wants to moderate the moderators


Post 63

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 1:14pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Brant,

No.

Michael


Post 64

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 2:42pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Michael wrote:

Just as an exercise in futility, I decided to do some statistics on the posts on this thread. I wanted to see if I my impression was correct or if I was being unfair to Nathan and others.

[Handy-dandy chart snipped...]

 
Wow.
 
Counting the posts of 28 posters and the words in every post, then adding them up--and putting them up in a handy-dandy chart for future reference, no less.
 
I'm framing my personal copy for display right next to my stuffed moose head, and I'll think of you every time I look at them.
 
Must have taken you HOURS. Certainly more time than the hour it took me to write those 2,000 words. Thanks.

What do I win?
 
I will let the readers draw their own conclusions from the facts as found.--Michael S. Kelley

Well said.

Nathan


Post 65

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 2:50pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nah, it just took me about an hour. Mostly automatic stuff I learned from translating. Then a bit longer, say about 15 minutes, to write the interpretation and revise.

Post 66

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 3:08pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Max wrote:

But I think Nathan tipped of an interesting part with the suggestion that he is not responsible for his emotions. In part this is right, because the instinct works faster than the reasoned thought, ...


Exactly. As Rand and Branden have pointed out, emotions work quickly and constitute subconscious appraisals such as, 'Is this for or against me?'

but this does not prevent you from counter-acting the primal emotion when you think it is only momentary event.

Yes. We are responsible for how we react to our emotions, to the degree those reactions are volitional. Some reaction is a matter of volition, and some is not.
...

So, are you responsible for your emotions no, but you are responsible for the deeds that derive from those emotions and thoughts.

Yes. So those who excuse personal attacks by making the other person responsible for their emotional reactions may as well be saying, 'If I cut you, you should not bleed.'

Nathan Hawking


 


Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 67

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 3:14pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Dear Dr. Davison:

Nathan,

Perhaps I am wrong, maybe it's a messiah complex.

Goodness! TWO psychological diagnoses in as many days. I'm certainly getting my money's worth.

Where do you wish me to send the five cents?

Nathan Hawking

That will be five cents, please. -- Lucy van Pelt




Post 68

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 3:26pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Michael wrote:

Nah, it just took me about an hour. Mostly automatic stuff I learned from translating. Then a bit longer, say about 15 minutes, to write the interpretation and revise.



Still, it was a wonderful and touching tribute to my contributions, for which I and my stuffed moose head thank you.

Now I feel guilty for failing to acknowledge all those 800-word posts of yours. I guess I just didn't realize we were keeping score.

Nathan


Post 69

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 3:29pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nathan, you are obviously a diverted transgressor with inverted delusions of confusions out of a debased inferiority complex.

Two bits, please.

--Brant


Post 70

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 4:01pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Brant wrote:

Nathan, you are obviously a diverted transgressor with inverted delusions of confusions out of a debased inferiority complex.



Yes, but it's SO much easier to say "thug."

Clearly you're bucking for the second annual Kelly Prolixity Award.

Nathan


Sanction: 17, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 17, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 17, No Sanction: 0
Post 71

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 4:37pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nathan: I thought you said you were leaving.

Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Post 72

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 4:56pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Well, had I known we were going to get all statistical-like...

contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent

Now THAT has GOT to get my word-count up. And, it is as meaningful, content-wise, as the average Stoly post...

Post 73

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 5:00pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nathan, I didn't say "thug" or mean that. :-(

--Brant

PS: I have no chance for that reward. Sigh.

(Edited by Brant Gaede on 6/25, 5:03pm)


Post 74

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 5:06pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Nathan: I thought you said you were leaving.

Peter, I guess Luke still has not defined "if" for you, has he?

Why don't you run along and eat your miraculous breakfast, fruit of freedom, before an invisible hand reaches out and smacks you?

Nathan


Sanction: 16, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 16, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 16, No Sanction: 0
Post 75

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 5:15pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"Why don't you run along and eat your miraculous breakfast, fruit of freedom, before an invisible hand reaches out and smacks you?"

Is this an example of the benevolence you wish us all to adopt?

You are making of this place the unpleasant place you said it was if you were to leave. Time to go, old son.

Post 76

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 5:19pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'm trying... I swear.. I'm trying... but...

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL...

Scott, you're killing me!

(tears streaming down from laughing)

Michael




(Edit - btw - ya gotta do it right. If there is no space after content, you only racked up 61 words, but after putting the space in, you now jumped up to 347 words in that post - unless anybody thinks that is cheating.)


(Edited by Michael Stuart Kelly on 6/25, 5:30pm)


Post 77

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 5:21pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Nathan, I didn't say "thug" or mean that. :-(

--Brant

PS: I have no chance for that reward. Sigh.
Nah. I never thought you did. Not to worry. You're taking this far more seriously than I am.

I was just using Scott's lovely word. The one he used just before I blackjacked him for saying that I essentially agreed with Barbara. The very idea.

Nathan "The Chuckling Thug" Hawking



Post 78

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 5:31pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Scott wrote:

Well, had I known we were going to get all statistical-like...

contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent
contentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontentcontent...


Nice try, dude, but if you wanna run up your stats for the second annual Kelly Prolixity Award you'll have to practice hitting that space bar.

Those things only count as one long word.

OristhereaLongestWordCategoryIhadn'theardabout?

I knew I shoulda studied German.

NH


Post 79

Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 5:53pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Peter C. needled:
"Why don't you run along and eat your miraculous breakfast, fruit of freedom, before an invisible hand reaches out and smacks you?"
Is this an example of the benevolence you wish us all to adopt?





Some wouldn't know benevolence if it gleefully hoisted them by the neck with one hand and punched them in the face with the other.

OK, well, admittedly that would be kinda hard to recognize.

NH



.
Benevolently edited to be less personally directed.

(Edited by Nathan Hawking on 6/25, 8:01pm)


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Forward one pageLast Page


User ID Password or create a free account.