About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 12:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
1) I can't think of any reason we shouldn't monitor temperatures and be open to mankind's possible contribution to global warming. I also can't think of any reason that so many people are so sure they are right about it on both sides.
2) IF we are raising temperatures, the solution will be technological, not regulatory. The chances that the problem will be solved within 100 years by technology is almost 100%. The chances that we will be able to destroy the earth during that period is pretty close to zero.
3) The only way we can cause real havoc is to regulate our economy into no growth and thereby fail to advance technologically. That isn't very likely, either, so the whole argument is less and less interesting to me from a survival perspective.
4) Like most things, the best idea is to get the government out of the way and let us evolve. It's okay. We will be alright.

Post 21

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 12:21pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Sounds reasonable to me, James.

Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 22

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 12:42pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Quote without comment:

Falling Sea Level Upsets Theory of Global Warming
By Mark Chipperfield in Tuvalu and David Harrison in London
Article from The Telegraph
6 August 2000


In the early 1990s, scientists forecast that the coral atoll of nine islands - which is only 12ft above sea level at its highest point - would vanish within decades because the sea was rising by up to 1.5in a year. However, a new study has found that sea levels have since fallen by nearly 2.5in and experts at Tuvalu's Meteorological Service in Funafuti, the islands' administrative centre, said this meant they would survive for another 100 years.
They said similar sea level falls had been recorded in Nauru and the Solomon Islands, which were also considered to be under threat. The release of the data from Tuvalu, formerly part of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands, will renew scientific debate about climate change and its impact on ocean levels. The island's scientists admitted they were surprised and "a little embarrassed" by the change, which they blame on unusual weather conditions caused by El Nino in 1997.
Hilia Vavae, the Metereological Service's director, said: "This is certainly a bit of a shock for us because we have been experiencing the effect of rising oceans for a long time." Although their country has been saved from imminent engulfment, not all islanders are happy about the change in Tuvalu's fortunes. Residents who once worried about their homes being flooded are now complaining that the lower tides are disrupting their fishing expeditions, making it difficult to moor their boats and navigate low-lying reefs.

More:
http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/global/sea_level.html


Post 23

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 10:31amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Since I am one of those who rode out two of those hurricanes [ I live in Tampa ], I must therefore comment and say it was only an abberated blip on the continua - as has been said, there is a cycling in hurricanes, as there is in every dynamic system in the universe, and we are entering into another, even tho the so-called warming of the Atlantic is not as pronounced as to make any such difference in numbers of them sprouting... so my personal contention is that global warming is a political foil for coercive efforts of power lusters - period!!!

Post 24

Sunday, September 25, 2005 - 12:57pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Robert Malcolm, I think that global warming is caused by emissions of hot air from politicians.

Post 25

Sunday, September 25, 2005 - 4:55pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
True enough - along with all the cows, there's a lot of bull around...

Post 26

Friday, September 30, 2005 - 12:40pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Sam,
The reference is slightly incorrect and doesn't point to the original story.

Here is the correct reference:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2000/07/06/wsea06.xml

Jeff



Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.