| | Duncan Bayne wrote:
I'm still nervous about how my submission will be received - it's something of a 'brain dump' of my political thinking of late. I am anticipating a degree of disagreement, & hopefully, a lot of worthwhile dialog :-)
I saw it, Bayne. You're toast. Made your will?
We need a new category, like "chewing" or "mulling" for folk with good-faith questions/reservations about some aspect of Objectivism that don't constitute "dissent" exactly but are more like a critical thinking aloud process. Good-faith critical thinking, not Laj-Barnes-type wanking. (What sort of pictorial moniker we'd come up with for something like "chewing" I hate to think. I certainly wouldn't let Andrew Bissell loose on *that* :-))
Mush like the cheek-turning article would still go into Dissent, though.
Linz
|
|
