About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Monday, January 12, 2009 - 10:53pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
We will have to agree to disagree, the way it looks right now! I do find I agree much more (with your last post, for example) when I substitute “collectivist”wherever I see “socialist aims” or “socialist ideal.”


You write:

“Please explain how liberals wanting to "plan" the economy isn't fascist AND socialist?”

“she's saying there is virtually no difference between the two [fascism and socialism]”

“what I've learned of National socialism, It was both [fascist and socialist]”

I take the above as insisting that fascism (regulation of the means of production,) applied consistently, logically leads to de facto socialism (group ownership of the means of production.) I agree and I said so in post 10. Rand and Peikoff also agree. *

Rand nevertheless insisted, in Fascist New Frontier (and in letters on the subject of that work,) that the Nazis were NOT socialistic, and that neither was Kennedy.

I am surmising, but the way I understand this is that she was tired of liberals assuring themselves that since they want heavy regulation of property but not state ownership of property, they are not socialists (and therefore not related to those “extreme ideologies” such as Nazism or communism.)

She is saying, ‘Not so fast. The Nazis were not socialistic, they did not implement socialism. Don’t tell me that you stand apart from them because they advocated group ownership while you don’t want that. The Nazis were just like you, in favor of private property regulated by the state.’

When I jumped in the thread was about comparing Nazis to modern liberals, and so I thought of and have been arguing Rand’s terms as she used them when she wrote on that comparison. In other places, Rand uses socialism as though it was interchangeable with collectivism.


*Getting away from verbalistic battles, it will be a tough slog to show that the Nazis ever reached the “logical end point” of the regulation of the means of production. Daimler-Benz, Krupp and many, many others were not shot up. They made fortunes before, during, after, and as you read this.



Post 21

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 10:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"I take the above as insisting that fascism (regulation of the means of production,) applied consistently, logically leads to de facto socialism (group ownership of the means of production.) I agree and I said so in post 10. Rand and Peikoff also agree. *"
I actually am saying that socialism applied consistently leads to de facto facisim. Maybe we're splitting hairs on that one.
I honestly get the exact opposite meaning from Rand's statements. I think she's saying "Not so fast, the Nazis had socialist goals too, your path will end in fascism the same as their did."

"*Getting away from verbalistic battles, it will be a tough slog to show that the Nazis ever reached the “logical end point” of the regulation of the means of production. Daimler-Benz, Krupp and many, many others were not shot up. They made fortunes before, during, after, and as you read this."

I'm sure a lot of people benefited from that system. Just because some people benefit, or are allowed to maintain control of certain things, that doesn't change what has happened when the state explicitly states that it controls all property and production. Just because some favored individual gets the thumbs up from the party to operate as he wishes today, doesn't change the nature of the system. Some people were allowed the trappings of luxury in the USSR as well.

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 22

Tuesday, January 20, 2009 - 6:11amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
In relation with the theme of this thread I received a post from a very good friend of mine on passages from Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and his first speech as German Chancellor which captures both the essence of collectivism in any of its varios forms (Communism, Fascism, Nazism, etc.) and, as Ron Pisaturo, a defender of Objectivism, mentions on his Webpage, the ethics and politics of the new president of the United States. Very dark clouds from everywhere are gathering over the world. Please see: http://www.ronpisaturo.com/ObamaBattle.htm

Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.