| | Yes, I thought classes like ethics and religion are already dead set on those stuff :D
If at all, I would give those courses a chance as voluntary courses to glimpse at obscure things. It is still amazing how much money you can make by simple astrology and a phone line.
@Steve:
Exactly, we should not teach it as if it is science, because it is not. It is a hypothesis which has no direct proof, but only proof by no-contrary-prove. They just pick some evidences out of history, that lacks an explanation with evolution theory. However, those incidences could be explained by a myriad of other explanations and therefore this particular explanation doesn't hold up.
Therefore we must protest that it is seen as a scientific theory. If they want to implement it into religious classes, no problem, but not as science.
And Bush wants to do it the science way, otherwise he would have put it directly to religious classes, however, he has not.
|
|
