About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, June 16, 2005 - 10:15amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I thought this was an OK action film. I didn't think it was a great film however.

I can't remember all the details, but I think there were quite a few holes in the plot.

(Edited by Marcus Bachler on 6/16, 2:17pm)


Post 1

Thursday, June 16, 2005 - 12:41pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I thought it was a competent movie, but I felt a little underwhelmed at the end. It did seem like it got a bit too much left on the cutting room floor, or something. I really loved the TV show. A lot of us in Cleveland follow things like that because of the Sam Shepherd case. I thought Ford delivered a very professional performance.  

Post 2

Thursday, June 16, 2005 - 1:00pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mathew, I'm not sure whether you're using "the full Hollywood treatment" as an endorsement or  a warning ...

Post 3

Thursday, June 16, 2005 - 1:31pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks for the comments.

Marcus,

To me, having two recognisably heroic characters coming into conflict with one another, rather than simply with baddies, introduces a fascinating dynamic that isn't present in the average action picture. (Peter touched on a similar point in his article today.) Didn't you find yourself cheering both Kimble and Gerard?

Rich,

Yeah I like the tv show too, how would you have preferred the movie to end? :-)

Peter,

I didn't mean the "Hollywood treatment" phrase to be inherently good or bad. There were a number of movies around that time that were based on classic television shows. Most weren't too great (The Saint, The Avengers etc.), but this one I thought was very good.

Matthew

Post 4

Thursday, June 16, 2005 - 3:20pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Great movie! Excellent choice, MH.

Post 5

Thursday, June 16, 2005 - 4:09pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks Bob :-)

MH


Post 6

Thursday, June 16, 2005 - 8:49pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
What I remember liking about this movie is that all the background is established in a sequence that runs behind the opening credits, and within the first five minute Dr. Kimble is already on the run. The movie just starts - BAM! - and the tension does not stop until the end. It's the kind of well-made, smart action movie that Hollywood so rarely makes. Not perfect, but neither does it require what I consider the standard cinema apology. I can't stand when someone tries to defend a poorly done, badly acted, unoriginal film by whining "It's only a movie" or "It's just supposed to be fun." That kind of attitude leads badly done movies and their badly done sequels. If people are willing to shell out $10 or more for crap and convince themselves it's money well spent, the industry can keep making well-marketed crap that breaks box office records. Movies that don't have to be forgiven much are becoming rarer.

OK, that was a bit off-topic but the action genre so rarely produces anything original. The Fugitive didn't rely on stereotypes and made for a smart, fun day at the movies.

Also off topic: I'm dismayed to see that the day at the movies in question was 12 years ago!

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.