About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 9:19amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
To Hong,

Myself: Transforming from a fundamentalist Christian, 'hell-bent' on promulgating and propagating altruism throughout the world -- to a radical, life-affirming, hero-worshipping, ethical individualist (a living example of a self-made soul).

Ed

Post 21

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 10:21amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Marconi and His Radio
That would be Tesla, and his Radio.  And Polyphase motor, and high frequency generator, and remote control torpedo, etc.  Tesla is responsible for inventing most of the components we use today to generate, distribute, and recapture electrical energy.  Giving every man thousands of kWh at his disposle. 

This was posted on solo previously

"“But I must live, I must return to work and build the motor so I can give it to the world. No more will men be slaves to hard tasks. My motor will set them free, it will do the work of the world”  Nikola Tesla on his Polyphase motor. 

The wright brothers

The guy in 'Longitude'

Mendel studying his peas and heredity

Darwin

Galieleo

Henry Ford

Isaac Newton

Benjamin Franklin, who said:

 I wish it were possible . . . to invent a method of embalming drowned persons, in such a manner that they may be recalled to life at any period, however distant;  for having a very ardent desire to see and observe the state of America a hundred years hence, I should prefer to any ordinary death, the being immersed in a cask of Madeira wine, with a few friends, till that time, to be then recalled to life by the solar warmth of my dear country
Aristotle and Ayn Rand of course.

Me, someday ;)

Michael F Dickey


Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Post 22

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 10:50amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
How do you do this without coming off as sucking up?

I guess you can't - so sucking up time it is:

My contribution:

The founding and maintenance of Solo.

Michael


Post 23

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 3:49pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'll probably get killed for this, but:

Doctor Who 2005 revivial

Christopher Eccleston

Billie Piper

John Barrowman

Russell T Davies

Any BBC executive involved with giving this revivial the green light.

[/anorak mode]

:-)

MH



Post 24

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 5:32pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
This is a great thread. I'm glad I started it, because several posters have introduced me to something or someone new and then given enough explanation to be resonant or intriguing. For example, I loved group theory in higher math classes, but I never knew anything about Galois, its inventer. It would have been enriching to know just the briefest information that num++ gave is [I think I can now infer his profession.]

One mild complaint, though about LPS ("lazy post syndrome"). Unless one is incredibly busy and just can't find the time, tersely giving a name or a list without any elaboration or explanation or indication of exactly what aspects you like is not persuasive. Writing a sentence or two reminds you of why you liked something [my post did that for me] and you relive it in the explaining. And it allows a reader to see what you admired, and so to reflect on whether he would like that too - and to go out and explore new values.

Same thing applies to other 'favorites' threads too, such as book recommendations or 'top ten' movies or musicians or artists.)

Phil

[so I don't inspire dotting the i and crossing the t "quibble posts", I hasten to add that I realize some things don't require explanation: "The Internet,
The Mobile Phone.." ]
(Edited by Philip Coates
on 6/21, 5:37pm)


Post 25

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 7:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Well Phillip I'm going to try to not be lazy about this...

I'm going to warn anyone reading this a lot of this is about my primary passion comics but there are other things as well.

Anthem
The Fountainhead
Andrei Taganov in We the Living
We the Living
Fransico D'Acconia in atlas shrugged
Atlas Shrugged
Ayn Rand

The Value of these is more or less obvious to anyone reading this but Fransisco was the turning point for me, his overall approach to life and just the complexity of the character is what sucked me in from the begining.  I love Andrei because I love a well constructed tragedy. And though anthem is not her most indepth work it is certainly her most beautiful and poetic.

Will Eisner's "Spirt"
Will Eisner's "A contract with God"
Will Eisner's "Into the heart of the storm
Will Eisner

The man who refused to treat comics as a kids game.  The book that started it all A contract with god, a collection of 4 deep mature stories which forced the reader into introspection in judgement of the characters and the actions (I especially love the story "the Super" about a building's lonley superintendant who makes some bad decisions and comes to a tragic end).  His character the Spirit had a whimsical but mature format that introduced new transitional devices credit/title formats, and page layouts.  Into the heart of the storm was the closest thing the man did to a life story covered the themes of life in New York, pre-WWII antisemitism in america, personal growth and making your own path in the world.


Ditko/Lee's Spider-man
Steve Ditko's Mr. A
Steve Ditko's Creeper
Steve Ditko's the Question

Steve Ditko was the man whom lead me to Objectivism, his crisp linework, control of light and individualism in his drawing and his heroes.  His kinetic action sequences and interesting plots drive his work to it's greatness.  His costume designs and character designs were more original than most who came before of after him from the faceless man in a suit In the question, to the animalistic Madman the Creeper, to the sealed in hidden inhumanity of Spider-man. I pick up an old volume of his work and afterwords I feel  invincible.

Lee/Kirby's Fantastic Four

These men were the two prime architects (with Ditko a close third) of Marvel's reinvention of comics, the methods they used seem simple and cliched now, but the fact that after them superheroes finally seemed like real people for the first time and group books finally had real group dynamics.

Frank Miller's Daredevil
Frank Miller's Sin City
Frank Miller's Batman
Frank Miller

Whether the man just writes or does everything himself it is the epitome of everything a good comic work should be, innovation, plot, character, style it's all there.  He gets bonus points for taking on thing's that by all rights shouldn't be as good or interesting as they are.  He took the fact that a rich man who dresses up like a bat and picks fights with criminals isn't realistic and if it were the type of man who might have some disturbing lower levels and ran with it.  He created a story where the only honest cop in a corrupt city had no choice but to trust a man who he had every right to view as insane. 

In Daredevil he took a character who is only defined by negatives, his mother left him when he was very young His father had a good heart but got forced into working as a mob enforcer. He has all these beautiful women he falls in love with, but they wind up hating him or dying. He got hit by some radioactive waste, didn't get a cent out of it, and didn't gain anything, in fact he lost his sight.  He still managed to become a lawyer and a costumed crime fighter... a real person would've at least become a criminal or more likely committed suicide after a life like this but this man became a hero.

His non-superhero work shines as well, because no matter how dark the exterior his heroes never loose sight of fighting for their goals.

Finally the guy is so inspiring to listen to when he talks about his craft I feel guilty for not picking up a pencil or a quill pen or sitting down and typing the second he finishes.  "I got into comics to make them more cinematic, I stay to make them less so."   "Is there anything more insipid than seeing an amazing hero like super man with a simple normal "girl next door" like Lois Lane... These peoples rage and battles bring down buildings, their love should as well"

Phil Jimenz's Wonder-Woman
Adam Hughes Wonder Woman

Two men with beautiful rendering technique on a great character.

Seigel and Shuschter's Superman

The two men who started it all. Originally they envisioned the character as a villain, but they couldn't remain like that.  The best way to describe how amazing their accomplishment is is to give the basic premise of their work... A planet is dying, by some miricle of scientific analasis someone finds a planet his son could survive on so he sends him there as the planet explodes.  Someone manages to find him, he's raised as a Kansas farm boy but when he gets old enough he has no trouble making it in his chosen field, he also can do a lot of things that no one else on earth can.  He moves to the city and what he wants to do with that power is fight crime and help people. Not out of a sense of altrustic duty but just because he can and it seems like fun. Sounds silly but they made it work.  Also they get bonus points for not creating the worst plot device in comic history "kryptonite"... When they were writing the stories were more about him learning what he could do against normal criminals and the occaisional threat that was as interesting as him, after kryptonite any petty meaningless thug became powerful enough to trump him. But two young jewish immigrants came up with this story with almost nothing to draw from and it became one of the most recognizable characters in the world.

Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry

Just the intensity and unyeilding integrity of the character and the performance inspire me.

Bruce Lee

The man redefined martial arts and was just inspiring to watch and listen to on top of being a major champion of philosophy (second possibly only to Rand herself in this century)

Rocky

The theme of a man refusing to yeild to impossible odds and being determined to carve out his own niche in history.

Darwin and Galielaeo

Two men in search of truth against all protests.

Any athlete at the top of their game
(for me gymnasts, divers, and fighters especially)

Metropolis

This film embodies the meaning of "they just don't make movies like that anymore." The skill in the special effects shots, the preformances of the actors the twists and turns of the plot, and the finale where Freder helps Grot to shake hand's with his Father Joh Frederson embodying the theme of the work "The mediator between the head and the hands must be the heart."

I guess that's all for now


---Landon


Post 26

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 7:13pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
In no particular order, impromptu:

The velvet voice of Jim Reeves, later years
The soulfulness of Patsy Cline
The interplanetary technology of JPL
The mind of Ed Witten
The music of Verde, Vivaldi, Tchaikovski
The images of Adams and Weston
The future vision of Raymond Kurzweil
The hopefulness of Star Trek
The optimism of Ronald Reagan
The individualism of Ayn Rand
The humor writing of Cheers
The techno-sound of Cher's Believe, farewell concert
The unashamed silliness of MST3K

NH


Post 27

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 8:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The music of jazz artist Chick Corea. There is not a malevolent or dark note in the many hundreds of his compositions. Whenever I listen to his album The Leprechaun, it always makes me feel as I imagined Ayn Rand felt with regard to her Tiddly Wink music.

P.S. Great thread Phil.
(Edited by C. Jeffery Small
on 6/21, 8:12pm)


Post 28

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 8:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nathan, Phil called for at least a one-liner IN ADDITION TO a listed example (got any additional one-liners TO GO WITH what you've already listed?).

By the way, what is MST3K? When I use my "spidey sense" on it, it comes out Michael-Stuart-Terminator 3 (Rise of the Machines)-Kelly. Please tell me that my spidey sense is wrong here. Please tell me you're not hijacking an "excellence" thread in order to poke a jab at MSK.

Ed

Post 29

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 10:10pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ed wrote:

Nathan, Phil called for at least a one-liner IN ADDITION TO a listed example (got any additional one-liners TO GO WITH what you've already listed?).

Nothing comes to mind.
By the way, what is MST3K? When I use my "spidey sense" on it, it comes out Michael-Stuart-Terminator 3 (Rise of the Machines)-Kelly. Please tell me that my spidey sense is wrong here. Please tell me you're not hijacking an "excellence" thread in order to poke a jab at MSK.

MST3K is Mystery Science Theater 3000.

Trade your spidey-sense in for Google-sense.  "MST3K" gives 3/4 million hits total.

NH

 


Post 30

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 10:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"Nathan, Phil called for at least a one-liner " I think what Nathan did in most cases: "The velvet voice of Jim Reeves, later years..The soulfulness of Patsy Cline..The hopefulness of Star Trek" was quite clear. It doesn't have to literally be a whole line if a single adjective or noun is telling.

There's a happy medium between long-winded and short-winded.

A young child once asked the very tall Abraham Lincoln how long a man's legs should be. He said, "Just long enough to reach the ground."

Phil

(Edited by Philip Coates
on 6/21, 10:13pm)


Post 31

Wednesday, June 22, 2005 - 12:49amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Phil, I sit (at my computer terminal) corrected.

Ed

Post 32

Wednesday, June 22, 2005 - 2:06amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Philip,

Thank you for starting this thread, and I guess your criticism about lack of explanation applies to my post #23. The post was meant somewhat humourously, and there's no way to explain this in one line, but here's what's so good about the show :-)

Doctor Who is an at-times rather eccentric British science fiction show that originally ran from 1963 to 1989. (There was also a television movie in the mid-90s which sadly failed to lead to a full scale revival.) However, executive producer Russell T Davies has now succeeded in getting a revival off the ground, and the three actors I identified all have roles in the show - Eccleston is the new Doctor (the character is a Time Lord, able to regenerate into a new body whenever he is killed, thus enabling a succession of actors to take the role); Billie Piper is his companion Rose, whom he meets early in the opening episode; and John Barrowman is Captain Jack Harkness, who is something of a rouge when we first meet him mid-season, but the Doctor and Rose bring out his good side and he joins them.

The revival has been greeted in the UK by both critical praise and ratings success. The performances from the leads are all terrific, including some superb chemistry especially between the Doctor and Rose, and the scripts are on the whole very well written. The season repeatedly touches on themes that may interest Objectivists, such as personal responsibility, heroism and refusal to compromise. While the revival does follow on from the continuity of the earlier versions, references to this "history" are few and always carefully explained so as not to alienate those new to the show.

The revival is already being aired in Canada and Australia. Nothing definite on the US yet, but the BBC is reportedly in negotiations with one of the major commercial networks.

***

That said, I wish to make clear that I of course agree with many of the suggestions by others here.

I would like to add Chris Sciabarra, for being himself ;-)

(Edited by Matthew Humphreys on 6/22, 2:10am)


Post 33

Wednesday, June 22, 2005 - 3:24amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The season repeatedly touches on themes that may interest Objectivists, such as personal responsibility, heroism and refusal to compromise.
Well, I think Russel T Davies is a bit of a lefty. He only steers towards individualism and self-responsibility because that is the nature of the Doctor, a bit of a mysterious loner.

But alone in this latest series there have been references to left-wing themes such as global warming, evil corporations and the excesses of commercialism.

The one time is was open and direct championing of the left-wing agenda was at the conclusion to an episode on WWII. After the Doctor saves the British from an alien menace he says something like, "Look what you got to look forward to now. Defeating Germany, the End of the War and the establishment of the Welfare State."

That was truly sickening.


Post 34

Wednesday, June 22, 2005 - 4:17amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Marcus,

I get the impression Davies is a bit left wing too, but I think you're overstating the strength of that comment on the welfare state. I took it more as a statement of fact: in the normal course of events (which the Doctor had restored by resolving the crisis) the welfare state is going to be established after the war. In the same dialogue I think the Doc said something about "20 years to pop music" etc.

MH


Post 35

Wednesday, June 22, 2005 - 4:12pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Jack Kilby, the electronics pioneer who invented the integrated circuit and won a Nobel Prize recented died. His genius put the electronics industry about 10 years ahead of where it would have been otherwise. Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce had the vision to see into future and make it happen.

Jim


Post 36

Wednesday, June 22, 2005 - 8:03pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nicola Tesla was definitely a modern-day Leonardo Davinci. The greatest scientific genius perhpas since Leonardo. As much as it pains me, it is true that he basically invented the radio, and not Mr. Marconi.

Post 37

Monday, June 27, 2005 - 4:40pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I, like Ed, sit corrected.

Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.