About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, May 18, 2006 - 2:20pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
HAHAHAHAhahahaha.

For once, I completely agree with Arlen Specter.


Post 1

Thursday, May 18, 2006 - 7:02pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hmmm, I just can't decide if this is funny or not ...
--
Jeff

Post 2

Thursday, May 18, 2006 - 9:23pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
It is funny, and that is sad.

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 3

Friday, May 19, 2006 - 7:29amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Actually what he meant to say was 'none of us is a protector of the constitution'.

Post 4

Friday, May 19, 2006 - 9:18amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Wolf,

Now THAT is funny (and THAT is sad).

Ed


Post 5

Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:19pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Oops! Thanks for the grammar correction Ed, I need all the help I can get. :-)

Post 6

Friday, May 19, 2006 - 1:31pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Actually what he meant to say was 'none of us is a protector of the constitution'.
Actually what he meant to say was 'NEITHER of us is a protector of the constitution' — (or am I missing something here?)

Sam



Post 7

Friday, May 19, 2006 - 1:39pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mick, you were orthogrammatical the first time (the FACT that it's funny IS sad).

I was only trying to call attention to what Robert (aka Wolf) had said -- and how that (it?) is REALLY sad!

:-)

Ed


Post 8

Saturday, May 20, 2006 - 11:50amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I love it.

There are only three times a United States Senator tells the unvarnished truth: in his sleep, when he's asked what time it is, or - as in this case - when he mangles his syntax and does it inadvertently.

Post 9

Saturday, May 20, 2006 - 2:29pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Yeah, Ed, it's called a Freudian slip.

Sam


Post 10

Saturday, May 20, 2006 - 9:10pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Sam,

==========
Actually what he meant to say was 'NEITHER of us is a protector of the constitution' — (or am I missing something here?)
==========

Yeah, you're right.

Friggin' pedant.

;-)

Ed


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.