About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 5:49pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Good find, Andrew!

I sincerely hope that this message reverberates for a long time after the smoke is cleared. Like Kelo, it could help in being a great springboard toward individualism in this country. And, if any of you say that I'm being callous by "using" disaster to "help" my cause of making life worth living, in this country; then -- and I mean this from the heart -- F#$% OFF!

Ed

Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 6:00pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ed, I hope you're right, but I suspect that exactly the opposite message will result from this fiasco: that the citizens of this country are needy serfs and wards who need a bigger, more powerful government that can satisfy their every need.

You can see this in the news coverage and the reaction in even the right-leaning blogosphere: Why didn't the government take care of everything? Which public officials were asleep at the switch? And so on. (Of course, the government's failure to maintain law and order was an unconscionable abrogation of its duties, but some commentators seem to think it should have turned the storm itself away from landfall.)

That "a bigger, more powerful government that can satisfy their every need" is both a contradiction-in-terms and a totalitarian nightmare is a point that will be lost on most Americans who contemplate these events.


Post 2

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 6:06pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ah, Mark Steyn, the other, *other* PJ O'Rourke.

He taught me the word "enfeeble", you know?

Ross



Post 3

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 6:33pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Further, and just as good:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/steyn/cst-edt-steyn04.html

The last paragraph is right on the money.

Ross

Post 4

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 6:36pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Here's some more wisdom from Mark Levin, from NRO's blog The Corner:

If, as a nation, we want the federal government to assume the role of first-responder in our communities, then I imagine its size and power will have to be massively increased for it to have the capacity to respond to local and regional natural disasters in this way -- even if it could. The federal resources and infrastructure for such an approach is mind-boggling. And it's possible that the very nature of our governmental system would have to be adjusted. And I wonder, in the end, whether it would make much difference with a disaster of this magnitude. (Indeed, even now, the vast majority of second-guessing and criticism -- rightly or wrongly -- is focused on the federal government's competence.) When the various "wise" overseers in Congress (who never seem to examine themselves) gear-up to examine the relief effort, let's hope they also look at the early actions of local and state first-responders. The competence of these officials might help explain whether the federal government's response was made more difficult. I don't know. And maybe strengthening local and state leadership is a key answer, and maybe the public will need to be more attentive to the quality and competence of their local and state officials and governments. I do not deny a major federal role in dealing with disasters. Indeed, I enthusiastically support it -- as I do federalism.

I also think as time passes, we are likely to learn more about the incredible and extraordinary efforts of both governmental and private institutions, faults and all. A CAT 4 hurricane, covering hundreds of miles along the Gulf Coast and millions of people; followed by flooding making 80% of New Orleans and large parts of Mississippi and Alabama unreachable; the complete destruction of infrastructure; and the almost immediate collapse of civil order, resulting in looting and worse. Five-days have passed at this writing; the military has taken back the streets; tens of thousands of lives have been saved; thousands more have been evacuated; and medical treatment is now being provided to most people. No, I'm not trying to paint a false picture, just a more complete one. And I realize that's little solace to those who've lost everything.


Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 5

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 6:38pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Andrew, you wrote:

=================
"a bigger, more powerful government that can satisfy their every need"
=================

Gee, that's sounds sort of like an old phrase I used to know. What was that phrase? ... "A Chicken for Every Pot" ... Hmm, and what was it that was a consequence to that 1928 sentiment (in 1929)?

Disturbing Andrew, REALLY disturbing ...

Ed

Post 6

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 6:44pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
What's really disturbing to me is that no one has raised the point, "Hey, shouldn't New Orleans and Louisiana have taken care of this themselves? And why is it our job to rebuild their levees and solve all these problems for them?" In fact, any public figure who did raise that point would probably be drawn-and-quartered, to the shrieks of "but they need our help!" and "there are people suffering, right now!"

Shudder.


Post 7

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 6:58pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Excellent find, Andrew!

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 8

Monday, September 5, 2005 - 9:56pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Andrew:

Thanks for the insight.

It is very unfortunate that the incompetent "relief" effort has generated calls for an even greater government involvement in future disaster recovery efforts when the approximately opposite response is the proper one.

The concept of individual resolve has lost even more legitimacy in the wake of this disaster.

Making matters worse are the "grief" councillors who have most definitely descended on the location of the disaster. I only bring this up because of the eye-opening article in the Aug/Sept issue of Reason entitled, "The Mental Health Crisis That Wasn't: How The Trauma Industry Exploited 9/11." I highly recommend that anyone who has not yet read this article do so. Follow the link: http://www.reason.com/0508/fe.ss.the.shtml

The article exposes how the 'trauma industry' assumes that individuals are perpetually vulnerable and unable to cope with any sort of crisis. It is one of the best magazine articles I have read in a long time.

Not to make light of the situation on the central Gulf coast, but when individuals regain the assumption of responsibility for their own actions, the world will most definitely be a better place.

All the best,

T



Post 9

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 - 1:50pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I found Steyn a couple of years ago,always worth a read.

http://www.marksteyn.com/index2.cfm?edit_id=25


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.