About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Tuesday, May 20, 2003 - 4:22amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I can't vote as NZ only has two IP addresses, and some other NZ voter always gets in before me. But I say Yes, of course. It's the difference between biography & public relations material. One of those two is still of interest in 10+ years.

But why do so I dislike that line, 'after all she was human'?

Post 1

Tuesday, May 20, 2003 - 5:37pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I, too, dislike the line, "after all she was human." I take issue with the fact that a person's life is open for all to view whether that person is dead or alive. Permission must be granted from someone, either an intellectual heir or otherwise. As I recall, no permission was given to even write the biography. Nathanial made the same egregious mistake in his book "Judgement Day."

Post 2

Thursday, June 5, 2003 - 10:23amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Taking responsibility for one's actions is paramount. I told my children, when they were small, that anything they do in life could end up as front-page news, and that if they find that thought uncomfortable, they could take it as a warning sign, or opportunity, to stop and rethink the situation... Are they proud of their actions? Can they stand by their choices with conviction? If not, what would Bryan Boitano do? (Silly South Park reference just for children. ;) Our ideals are our guides in life. Children are still forming their ideals and they naturally look to their heroes for guidance.)

Rand, Barbara and Nathaniel, are all responsible for the choices they have made. If I were in Barbara’s position, I would not have written about Rand’s personal life. (The ‘I can slam your heroes down to size' books, do nothing but depress me.) A person’s work can be executed in moments of perfect purity, clarity, and grace and there is always such a thing as a ‘do over’ before one’s art is published. Unfortunately, the way most people conduct their day-to-day lives rarely matches those precious moments, and there are no ‘do overs’ in real life. A flawed life does not negate the art resulting from that life. The ‘ideal’ is the goal, not the norm. The art defines the ideal.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.