About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, August 28, 2003 - 7:35pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
My answer to this question would be: it depends on what one means by 'applying the principles'.

If one means making moral decisions and deciding how best to live *my* life, dead easy.

If one means explaining to *other people* my philosophical beliefs, forget it! Almost everyone I know is either implicitly socialistic in their outlook or has simply never thought about the moral basis for our system of government and therefore accepts the status quo as a given. I have given up trying to explain where I am coming from, as invariably people simply do not 'get it'.

If asked point-blank my political views I will say I am a libertarian, but I do not go around 'preaching'. I for one do not see it as being in my rational self-interest to be looked upon as some kind of cross between Adolf Hitler and a child-molester, morally speaking. If I find someone who may actually see where I am coming from I may make an effort. Otherwise I do not see it as worth my while to try and 'convert' people who are entrenched in their views, and who furthermore are simply not *interested* in philosophical or moral questions.

I think there is an interesting parallel here with Christianity. Most 'born-again' Christians do *not* in fact go around telling others about it. Is this because they don't see Christianity as valuable? No, they are simply realists and see that the other party is unlikely to be convinced by their arguments. They, like me, therefore save their breath and time and just get on with *their* lives (leaving aside the obvious difference that Christians think that 'their' life is in fact God's!)

Post 1

Saturday, May 1, 2004 - 10:45pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
If one means explaining to *other people* my philosophical beliefs, forget it!

LOL, I can relate John...in fact I only discuss philosophy/science online these days, as most people are not only illiterate, they actually reject the idea that philosophy{superior thinking} is of any benefit...and who can blame them, I mean what benefit is knowing anything about truth when you have an xbox/plasma screen.

I consider philosophy as the ongoing pursuit of proper knowledge for the purpose of attaining wisdom....if anyone rejects that, they're obviously content to revel in their own mediocrity.
I think it should be obvious by now{this day and age}, that only a handful of people are ever interested in philosophy and presumably that will remain the status quo for the foreseeable future.


Post 2

Sunday, May 2, 2004 - 10:26amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Johnathan, David,

I have a great deal of sympathy with your views.

The Freedom vs. Government thread is addressing this same question and you might find my posts, Post 2, and Post 4, as well as David MacGregor's posts, Post 7 and Post 11 interesting.

I would be interested in your comments on that thread.

Regi


Post 3

Thursday, May 6, 2004 - 12:10pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Objectivism is just an affirmation of man's natural state. You don't have to "try" anything. People run into problems when they "try" too hard, like confusing vanity for ego, or flagellating themselves for being "evasive" or maintaining a constant high level of "focus".

That being said, it is worth our while to "untie" all those philosophical knots we've collected over the years and to understand logic, but other than that just do what comes natural. Don't torture yourself by trying to live up to some fantastical objectivist ideal.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.