About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Sunday, September 29, 2002 - 7:35pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Atlas Shrugged, without a doubt: said it all, showed it all, and with a great sense of life, too.

As Rabbi Hillel said in a different context, all the rest is commentary.

Post 1

Saturday, October 5, 2002 - 2:26amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Atlas Shrugged was the one I enjoyed the most, and I loved The Fountainhead, but to me Anthem is special. It was the first one I read, and it was a defining moment in my life. At the time it was the most beautiful piece of writing I had ever read.

Post 2

Wednesday, June 4, 2003 - 9:01amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
We the Living was were it all began for me, but the Fountainhead is my favorite work in the fiction category. The Romantic Manifesto is my favorite of the non-fiction books.

Post 3

Thursday, June 5, 2003 - 8:38amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
My problem with Atlas Shrugged is John Galt. He seems to have been hatched from an egg as a perfect human. He makes all his rational choices instinctively. I could not help wanting to know more about how this perfectly perfect human came to be. He walked the walk, and talked the talk, but his character was never as fully explored, as was ‘Howard Roark’ in the Fountainhead. As a reader, I found that disappointing.

Post 4

Thursday, June 5, 2003 - 9:09amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
A frequent criticism of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead by non-objectivists is that the
characters are one-dimensional. Why would an author who is trying to make a philosophical
statement endow her characters with irrelevant idiosyncrasies? They are supposed to be
ideals and it would be pointless to expound on their childhoods to give you an understanding
of how they got to the ideal state they are in. If we delved into the background of Wesley
Mouch and found he was picked on in the school yard it would tend to depict him as a
victim rather than the villain he is. If John Galt were from a wealthy family he would be
deemed "privileged" and not noble.

Post 5

Thursday, June 5, 2003 - 10:51amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Perhaps I should have said that although he operates in a rational manner, he is shown to me as acting instinctively, and therefore with out choice. It left me with the understanding that there was no process of growth in John. That he was simply born perfect with out choosing his perfection.

Post 6

Thursday, June 5, 2003 - 10:54amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Howard Roark however, is magnificently portrayed and fully explained. :)

Post 7

Saturday, November 15, 2003 - 10:49pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I have to throw in a vote for 'The Fountainhead' Roark was by far the best character she developed. Atlas was more comprehensive in it's depiction of her philosophy and the world but was less effective as a work of fiction. I should add that I have some issue of the character of Reardon. In my experience comopetant administrators are rarely the best engineers or inventors. "Reardon Metal' would have been created by one of his employees and not the man himself IMHO.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.