| | Only saw some of the last 10-15 minutes of the movie. I'd agree that as a profession, arms dealing is not necessarily immoral. However, selling to an obvious thug, whom one knows is going to (imminently) violate the lives of innocent people, does, I feel, make one an accomplice in that act. I did not see the set up for that (second to) last scene, but received the impression that without those arms, the thug would have had to at least delay his intentions. That may have been all that was possible for Gage's character - to delay him - but selling the arms was clearly the same as signing that village's death warrant.
jt
|
|
