| | Point of grammar: in Greek, the participle "being" is of a different declension from the other words you cite. They are nominatives. The nominative of the participle is "on" (the o being an omega, like the o in "bone", rather than an omikron like the o in "got"); "ontos" (omikron in both places) is, despite the coincidentally similar formation, the genitive - the grammatical case for origin or possession among other uses. That's why you didn't find "ontos." (The ontos.org site is wrong on this point.) On / ontos Logos / logou Pathos / pathous Ethos / ethous
An alternative word for "being" as an abstract noun, which Aristotle uses extensively, is "ousia." This should serve your purpose. "Being" or "entity" are the likeliest translations; Aristotle's translators traditionally but misleadingly use "substance."
If by "appeal to being" you mean "appeal to facts," then "logos" looks like the one to use. Aristotle gives us a list of mental faculties capable of responding to an argument. "Being" isn't a natural fit. Reminds me of a question on an aptitude test - which item doesn't belong?
(Edited by Peter Reidy on 6/13, 11:05am)
|
|