About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 - 6:43amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
What can Objectivists offer in attempting to solve the "mystery" of time. For instance, what do they have to say about so-called "block-time" (according to which time is a fourth dimension where past, present and future all co-exist across a "time-scape")?

Post 1

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 - 1:20pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'm not sure that Objectivism covers the possibility of four-dimensional space, where time becomes a dimension along with the three spacial dimensions of height, width, and depth. At least, I haven't read any Objectivist literature concerning the nature of time; the philosophy appears to treat time as part of existence and a commodity to be used as purposefully and passionately as possible, as we are mortal and our time is limited.

Now, I am a self-taught programmer and not a mathematician, so please do not assume that I am speaking ex cathedra. =^..^=

If you've any knowledge of Cartesian graphing, you might remember that space can be mathematically represented as a grid with three axes -- x, y, and z -- which correspond to width, height, and depth respectively. A point in space can be represented by a set of (x, y, z) coordinates.

Now, to represent time as well as space mathematically, we'd need a fourth axis -- a t axis -- that corresponds to time. We could then claim that a given object not only has a location in space but a series of locations in time as well.

On the other hand, I might be mistaken in extrapolating high-school maths to account for 4D space. However, I think it makes sense as an abstraction.

Post 2

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 - 10:30pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
It depends from what point of view you're talking. As a general definition, we can say that time is a measure of causality.

On a neurological basis, time and ordered timelines is another of the features of our mental models that help the self make sense of event processing. In the brain, events do not happen nearly as sequentially as we are aware of. Our perception of time in general is, as any other perception, proper to our means of cognition.

In physics, we now know that time and space are related - for example, relativistic speeds entail a change in weight and the rate of time.

As Matthew Graybosch pointed out, a fourth axis is needed to pinpoint the location of an object in time. A simple location is sufficient in a situation where all we need is to find an object at a given punctual time, but such a system is functionally incomplete.

Post 3

Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 6:23amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Francois, I thought that relativistic speeds entailed a change in mass, not weight, as weight is a measure of gravity's effect on a body. For example, a man with a mass of 90 kilos on earth still masses 90 kilos in orbit, despite the fact that he's weightless.

Post 4

Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 11:13amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
There was really no need to explain to me what mass and weight are. But thanks anyway. And you were right, it is mass.

Post 5

Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 11:41amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I saw a need to explain because it isn't just you that's reading it. I didn't intend to talk down to anybody; I only intended to define my terms so that any reader could understand what I was talking about. I'm sorry if I sounded overly pedantic.

Post 6

Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 12:19pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Is ok, but I'm still not sure what angle your original question was trying to address.

Post 7

Thursday, October 31, 2002 - 7:09amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Perhaps, "What time is it?"

7:09 AM (Pacific)

Post 8

Thursday, October 31, 2002 - 7:18amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Regarding the above post ("Perhaps, 'What time is it?'"): I hope my injection of levity into an otherwise somber discussion is taken with good humor.

Post 9

Wednesday, June 4, 2003 - 6:47pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The best definition I have ever heard of time is

'time... what stops everything happening at once.'

Post 10

Tuesday, September 16, 2003 - 11:57amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Could anyone give me definitions of "time", "causality", "cause", "effect" without circular definitions? Even better, can it be shown that time is a necessary feature of reality? It seems to me that the implication operator in logic is a representation of cause and effect. Does this indicate some kind of deep connection between time and logic?

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.