About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2


Post 40

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 7:53amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Wordy bugger, wasn't he...

Post 41

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 8:05amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Oh, come on Robert,

Let me feed the troll just another tidbit.

Ed inquired about this particular troll's public efforts for Objectivism.

So let's be fair. He does post bitching and rants on Solo...

Michael


Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Post 42

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 10:28amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael,

I can understand Hudgins using an activity over substance argument, what other choice does he have, because he has done something, but you, you have done nothing. Why are you asking a question?

Oh, I forgot your often! repeated resume...
your a brown noser...
you were a drunk...
and a drug addict...
and your mother-in-laws bitch.

Laugh Out Loud Out Loud Out Loud Out Loud Out Loud Out Loud



Sanction: 23, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 23, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 23, No Sanction: 0
Post 43

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 12:06pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Glenn Heppard,

I wish to make my opinion crystal clear. You are a fucking useless lousy bastard. Do us all a favor, take your shit elswhere.

That feels better!

Ethan


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 44

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 12:16pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
did someone just order up some moderation at the corner table?

Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Post 45

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 12:20pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Glenn,

Just killing time fly-swatting.

Request for executive evaluation:

Linz or Joe:

Is the type of discourse given in Post 42 (especially that derogatory remark about the deceased ex-mother-in-law I still dearly love) tolerated on Solo as "passionate argument"?

Michael

Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Post 46

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 1:43pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Sigh. Are the children coming running to Daddy? Look, if folk are going to call someone a "dumb little troll" & a "fucking useless lousy bastard" etc., they must expect something similar back. Mr. Heppard's first post was quite unexceptionable. He thinks TNI lacks credibility because conservatives are allowed to write in it. That's a perfectly reasonable point of debate. I disagree with Heppard, as should have been clear from my statement of my own editorial policy, but I felt no need or desire to call him a dumb little troll. If we're going to moderate Glenn, Michael, shall we also moderate you & Ethan?! :-)

If you truly think he's a troll, don't feed him!

Linz

Post 47

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 1:47pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Heh!

I don't care if he's moderated. I just want to state my opinion on him.

Ethan


Post 48

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 1:49pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Actually, now that I think about it, Glenn *is* moderated. I passed his posts yesterday & Joe must have passed them overnight (NZ time).

Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Post 49

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 1:55pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Glenn: you have done nothing. Why are you asking a question?

Oh, I forgot your often! repeated resume...
your a brown noser...
you were a drunk...
and a drug addict...
and your mother-in-laws bitch.

Done nothing????
Just a man with balls can come out from hell!

Daymmmn! sometime I miss being the mafioso I was!



Post 50

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 2:07pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Linz,

The dumb little troll thing happened after several "civil" posts, and then this dude started making allusions to Robert B's intelligence.

Agree with Robert or not, he is not stupid - he most certainly knows what ad hominem argument means. After he started calling Ed Hudgins the equivalent of worthless, I did for Ed what I would do for you.

My issue was not over this dude's misguided, but "perfectly legitimate" point of debate. He is entitled to his opinion, but I must say that his credentials do not impress me too much.

Nothing warrants him talking about my relatives, though. Or can I start talking about someone's whore of a mother now when I disagree with them?

Michael

(Edited by Michael Stuart Kelly on 10/19, 2:10pm)


Post 51

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 2:09pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
As long as it Glenn Heppard's I'd say GO FOR IT Michael. You do have too much taste for that though :-)

Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 52

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 3:41pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Bravo, Linz!
Sigh. Are the children coming running to Daddy? Look, if folk are going to call someone a "dumb little troll" & a "fucking useless lousy bastard" etc., they must expect something similar back.
I cannot imagine demanding that you do this or that because someone insulted me - or my mother, my cat, or that odd-looking fellow that lives down the street from me.  Have the alleged Objectivists here overlooked the virtue of independence that might prompt them to stand up on their own two hind feet?

Andy


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 53

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 3:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Post 43 was suppose to be, based on your long winded story. 

"and your mother-in-law's bitch."  

Michael, I think your mother-in-law must have been a saint if she had to put up with even half of your pretentious, cry baby-winning, fallacious sucking up, and pretending to be an intellectual pap that everyone at SOLO has to. 


Ms. Dawee, opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one.


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 54

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 4:08pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Glenn, I let that one through, but I don't want to see any more in that vein. Same goes for Ethan & Michael. You've all had your fun. Now get back to talking about TNI or drop off the thread.

Linz

Post 55

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 4:24pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Fine with me, Linz. Heppard is your boy, not mine.

Sorry I asked you to look at the post. That was the first and last time I ask you to look at a specific post. It simply won't happen again.

Just for clarity's sake, because there is one hell of a bad impression caused by your "daddy" comment, I would like to quote a line in my e-mail to you:
I can handle myself - so no problem if you don't want to do anything. I can do my thing on him. It does fit moderation criteria, however.
btw - The more I read The New Individualist, the more I like it. Robert, Ed and company did a fine job. I hope they continue their brilliant work in this same line.

Michael

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 56

Tuesday, November 1, 2005 - 8:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Bruce Thornton, TOC's "Objectivist-helper," has written about "Godless materialism menaces the fate of the west" over at www.victorhanson.com


--"Fortunately for us, there is still among our citizens a reservoir of faith and belief, particularly among the military. But how long can the "spiritual parasites," to use Unamuno's phrase, the secularists and materialists continue to live off the spiritual certainty of their fellow citizens and spiritual capital amassed over the centuries and expressed in our political institutions?"

When he speaks of "spiritual parasites," he means YOU! 


Thornton seems to be pointing at Ed Hudgins and his "The need for a New Individualism" article when he talks of those, --"who endorse a debased Enlightenment belief that religious faith is a quaint remnant of our primitive past, one that modern thought has discredited as a neurosis. Thus religion is considered a mere life-style choice, and Christianity is an option no better or worse than wicca, Scientology, or nudism."


He even includes his ideas behind the "brilliant critique of multiculturalists" in the current issue of The New Individualist.

--"the most intolerant and bigoted of religions, Islam, is given a pass for its depredations, while the true religion of peace-- the religion of martyrs, not warriors, the religion of self-sacrifice, not conquest --is played up as a threat to the republic at home a danger to peace abroad. Western historical behavior that was a violation of Christianity's core values..."

That sounds like someone who "is completely consonant with Rand."


--"a faith in the superiority of freedom and self-determination" 

If I close my eyes I can almost hear Ayn Rand say that.


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2


User ID Password or create a free account.