About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Wednesday, June 1, 2005 - 8:31pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
sounds like a solid reason to check your emotions with reason to me.  Trust should be something someone earns not something that you feel. 

(to make myself clear here, I am not doubting that science can make a person feel trust.  I am just saying that making sure you trust someone for a REASON and not just because you feel its right is a sound idea.)

~E.


Post 1

Thursday, June 2, 2005 - 8:56amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Eric J. Tower cautioned: "I am just saying that making sure you trust someone for a REASON and not just because you feel its right is a sound idea..."

Well, something like 26% of the test subjects did not fall for the drug.  So, did they need a bigger hit?  Or are they more rational than emotional in their make-up?  Or do they greatly value money? 

It would be interesting to follow up with that minority to see what makes them tick.


Post 2

Thursday, June 2, 2005 - 10:46amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Dis-inhibition and trusts are not the same thing. Not sure these folks were looking at the correct process.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.