island proejct are a place for objectvists or just a other id fraud

case not closed
i dont claim anything just open end quastins :)
the atlantic(or ocenica ?)project was not a fraud (new state project in the early 90s counstuion written in enghlis and mexican build in west indian earn mony form healt care and banking services )
they did write a constuion and got some investores, its surivalsits/constuionsts/milita and back to the 1800 libertaisn constuion projects out there.
yours are experts on objectvisim and libertansim yours know more dealtils your know its and link, i am just a guy from north europe that get strange looks if i menntion some of the objectvist ideas so i want yours wiew on it
and did anybody sue them for fraud ?

your foks have probebly read more how too build-your-owen-country kind of books so your probely know more abut new nation projects then me
what ahppend if they fail if ppl sue them what makes them be a fraud? and whats make them guilty of scams?
just faild projects ?
where do you go to find oute if they got civil lawsuiets?do the unhappys citizens and invetsores startes a new project somewhere else like eh normal bussnis fauilers and bankcrupicys?
becuse new utopia are one of the most media hyped new state projects it have been dealyed wach year since 1998 somebody take action or do libertaisn/objectvist proejcts allwasy get ddelayed bacuse nobdoy can agree on anything maybe

Post 21

Saturday, November 27, 2010 - 6:35am

Does anyone on this forum remember (many years ago) the Russian dude who claimed to be a general who was going to take over the country and was amassing his troops? Polaris (who spells his own name correctly) reminds me of him. Maybe he's the same guy just messing around with us.

Sam

Post 22

Saturday, November 27, 2010 - 7:43am

I don't know, Sam, you may be right.

On another thread, I have given Polaris an olive-branch warning: Be prepared to get better at typing English for participation in a forum like this, or be prepared to get ignored.

Ed

Post 23

Sunday, November 28, 2010 - 9:50am

Years ago, on a galaxy far, far away -- on another Objectivist forum -- Jeff Riggenbach, whom you may have heard of (he wrote a book on revisionist American history) would write funny posts with deliberate misspellings, but the misspellings were homophonic -- correct in one context but incorrect as he was using them, so they would not be caught by a spell checker. For example:

"Eye wood knot agree with yore con clue shun, butt eye wood sue port yore rite two right watt ever yew wont."

Ever wonder why Polaris doesn't use a spell checker?

Post 24

Sunday, November 28, 2010 - 10:47am

Bill,

"Eye wood knot agree with yore con clue shun, butt eye wood sue port yore rite two right watt ever yew wont."

:-)

Ever wonder why Polaris doesn't use a spell checker?

Good question. His self-acclaimed IQ is at a genius-level, and he doesn't still doesn't take simple and basic precautions like spell-check when writing in a "second" language. It is very, very odd.

Ed

Post 25

Monday, November 29, 2010 - 8:08am

Ed,

Eye halve bin tolled yew halve a hi Eye Cue. It must bee dew two yore playing sew much pool, a game in witch yew halve too keep yore Eye on the Cue (ball). If yew due, peep hole will say yew halve a hi Eye Cue. Eye wish Eye had a hi Eye Cue. Eye all ways yews a spell check her, butt it dozen seam two help.

Post 26

Monday, November 29, 2010 - 2:15pm

oirgnialy postde bye polars but I carlassely presed the rong buten:

========================================
why do sombody that are intrested in the objectvist truth spend so much time on the structuer as spelling and not look deep and find the ideas ?(derrida ?heidegger? come to mind as foks close to this thinhing)when you dont need to understand all the words when you can get the context/concespt of a ideas or are this the reasson why objectvism have a lots of spilnting gruops ?

reasson polaris are not hard to spell (anyway i did take it from a 4wd ATV and not the name of ppl live on Englishe polar ice or whatever this name should be known in a lexicon) i learned moste of my by read English and American newspaper but what abut discuss my post's and think this are the forum for English teachers in webster dictonoary ?why do americans rant abut bad spelling offen they can only speak enghlis at bext some mexican spanis and they have not travel outside ther owen country ???(at least to a difrent culture becuse then you need a passport to travel outside north america, purto rico and behamas (plus panama and bermuda ??)
nej jag er inta russiska ;)

eh this spellcheck just put yellow coluer on the words not any susgtion on how to spell them that dont help you much when you are dyslectic and its learn on youer owen....

Post 27

Monday, November 29, 2010 - 2:48pm

I can't help but comment on this gem:

... this spellcheck just put yellow coluer on the words not any susgtion on how to spell them ...

Doesn't that sound like Yosemite Sam or somethin'? Maybe Foghorn Leghorn? Or the "Colonel" from the "Go, Go, Gophers watch 'em go, go, go" Saturday morning cartoon of the 1970's?:

"Them, thar spellcheck'em gadgets ain't ne'er been much help to a rugged cowboy such as mahself. Them dadgum things ain't ne'er put mah words back together again from being all jumbled up in tha' first place! Shoot me wit' a pea-shooter. I'd just as soon git' me one of them dadgum Speak-N-Spell toy thingees that Walmart sells to the little kinfolk!

Probbly git' mah words right with that high-tech piece o' finely-crafted machinery. Maybe I should write to Mr. Hasbro an' see if I cain't git' me one of them machines fer free, on account of mah situation an' all that. Ah, shucks. Who am I kiddin'? I ain't ne'er write me no letters to no folk no how. Sassafras on a pickle. I don't know how I'm ever gonna' prove to tha' world that I'm a dadgum genius -- if I ain't ne'er gonna' learn myself on how to write better."

Ed

(Edited by Ed Thompson on 11/29, 2:56pm)

Post 28

Monday, November 29, 2010 - 2:55pm

You guys crack me up!

Ed

Post 29

Monday, November 29, 2010 - 9:18pm

Good one, Ed! And Dean, are you sure Polaris didn't write that?

Post 30

Wednesday, December 8, 2010 - 9:44am

Did someone refer to the Supreme Commander! I was around for that guys stint on SOLOHQ as well. He was funny :-)

Post 31

Wednesday, December 8, 2010 - 9:09pm

Yeah, Ethan. But at first he wasn't funny ... he was a very good fraudster, and some readers weren't quite sure whether he was genuine, or not. I wish I knew how to retrieve his thread(s).

Post 32

Thursday, December 9, 2010 - 2:07am