About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4


Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 80

Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 8:47pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Steve Wolfer was puzzled:  "In Post 9, Michael says ... Then he points out that ...  Yet here he is now in post 74 ...  Why conflate people that have violent mental breakdowns with conservative, white nationalist and Christian terrorists - or with any terrorists?
There is no single, universally accepted definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “...the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)
http://www.fbi.gov/publications/terror/terror2000_2001.htm

Steve, I confess that I do not have a complete theory of crime.  For my senior thesis paper in criminology theory, my topic was The Choice to Think: A Metachoice to Explain the Conflicting Data of Rational Choice Theory. My professor was Liqun Cao.  My foundation was Criminal Justice? edited by Robert Bidinotto.  That work rests heavily on the research reported in Dr. Stanton Samenow's Inside the Criminal Mind.  Rational choice theory is the classical theory of crime.  (There are probably a dozen major theories and another dozen more mid-range theories of crime -- more on that, later.)  In Bidotto's anthology, Dr. David Kelley asserted that there is no such thing as a "spontaneous" murder.  Every murder -- perhaps every crime -- is premeditated, planned, fantasized and ideated repeatedly until it blossoms apparently without cause.  Kelley's case study was a Green Beret doctor who "suddenly" killed his wife.  However, the essay was without any substantiating evidence.  It was entirely conjectural. 

The primary problem with such case studies is getting to the truth.  That seems like a tautology but as a professional psychologist yourself, you realize that people do not always "know" why they do things and even if they do, they might tell a different story.  In the case of a convicted killer, the motivations to lie are obvious. Some criminals are "deniers" and others are "excusers."  You can buy into their baloney or not.  Of all the theories, rational choice -- and the Randian explanation of the "blank out" -- makes the most sense in most cases, but does not explain all crimes or all criminal acts.

That said, people develop mental habits, and that includes criminals.  Jihadists or nazis, ELF or NLF, crips, bloods, homies, pachukos, the mafia, all of the new ethnic mafii, and the spousal abuser, all engage in self-reinforcing inputs.  That is to be expected.  So, it is not that listening to rightwing talk radio "makes" someone shoot a liberal, any more than reading pornography induces someone to commit rape.  Nevertheless, it is no surprise when a serial rapist is discovered to have a large video library of violent pornography.  It is no surprise when a rightwing terrorist has a copy of The Turner Diaries.  (Agreed, I read The John Franklin Letters upon which it was based back in 1966 or so.  I have not shot anyone and thus, free will.)

For my term paper for Terrorism for First Responders, I wrote about ELF, The Earth Liberation Front, considered to be America's most dangerous domestic terrorist threat.  Researching that, I came upon the leftwing claim of a "green scare" analogous to the "red scares" of the 1920s and 1950s.  From there, I found a wealth of information about rightwing terrorism.  Part of my research came from a white paper issued by the Southern Poverty Law Center.  For their work, I sent them a check.  Now, I am on their mailing list.  I get their Intelligence Report.  In this month's issue, "North Meets South: Yankee Secessionists Partner with Racist Neo-Confederates." 


Post 81

Friday, August 1, 2008 - 3:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

A Selfless Killer

Anthrax scientist Bruce Ivins, about to be indicted on capital charges for the 2001 Anthrax mailings, has killed himself. Is Michael Marotta seeking an "Objectivist connection"?

Ivins, an award-winning (Roman Catholic!) Anthrax researcher, who volunteered for the Red Cross, was described by Fox News, reporting on his violent threats and suicide, as having "given back to the community." (!!!)

In a piece about a mass murderer who killed from altruistic purposes (yes, I'll be so bold as to make that claim,) it is abominable to characterize him as a charitable person.


(Edited by Ted Keer on 8/01, 4:29pm)


Post 82

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 - 3:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

I wonder if Hamas counts? Oh, wait, no Objectivists...

Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Post 83

Sunday, February 15, 2009 - 10:25amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Radical Christian Terrorists on Bill O'Reilly



"The Episcopal suppository bomber"

(Edited by Ted Keer on 2/15, 12:39pm)


Post 84

Sunday, February 15, 2009 - 1:03pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Sometimes I wonder where you find these things...


...but on Bill O'Reilly? Sitting with that creep...

jt

Post 85

Monday, February 1, 2010 - 10:17amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
What did the makers of American Carol know, and when did they know it? They described the actions of the Underwear Bomber (see the clip in #83 above) over a year before the attack.

Post 86

Monday, February 1, 2010 - 10:32amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ah - nothing like inspiration, huh [unless, perhaps perspiration?]

Post 87

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 3:26amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

'Christian warrior' militia accused in plot to kill police

March 30, 2010 5:14 a.m. EDT

Six Michigan residents, two residents of Ohio and an Indiana resident were indicted by a federal grand jury in Detroit, Michigan, on charges of seditious conspiracy, attempted use of weapons of mass destruction, teaching the use of explosive materials and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence, U.S. Attorney Barbara L. McQuade and FBI Special Agent in Charge Andrew Arena announced.

The group says on its Web site that Hutaree means "Christian warrior" and proclaims on its home page, "Preparing for the end time battles to keep the testimony of Jesus Christ alive."

"Generally, Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the 'New World Order,' engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing or advocate or adhere to extreme anti-government doctrines," the Southern Poverty Law Center said in a report, "Rage on the Right: The Year in Hate and Extremism."

The Law Center also defines Patriot groups as "militias and other organizations that see the federal government as part of a plot to impose 'one-world government' on liberty-loving Americans."

According to the indictment, Hutaree members view local, state and federal law enforcement authorities as the enemy and have been preparing to engage them in armed conflict.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/29/michigan.arrests/index.html?hpt=C1


Post 88

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 6:14amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Meanwhile...

Walmart kid not the big prejudice story
By Times Op-Ed
March 28, 2010, 3:00AM
By Milton W. Hinton Jr.

Last week much of Gloucester County [NJ], as well as the entire nation, focused on an incident at the Walmart in Washington Township. Reportedly, a 16-year-old from Atlantic County, on two separate occasions, activated the store intercom and told the black patrons to leave the store.

This young man certainly needs to learn that there are consequences for inappropriate actions, but let’s be careful about throwing him to the lions. It seems that in one short week this teen has become the face of racial prejudice from coast to coast, as this incident was carried by network TV news, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and numerous other media sources.

It appears that there are those willing to allow this boy to be the sacrificial lamb; happy that the anger and attention of the public are on him, while they continue to implement their own agenda of superiority. Although many condemn the acts allegedly committed by this boy, it should also be recognized that the greatest threat he poses is to himself, and at the end of the day he really has very little influence or authority over anyone else.

Turn around and look in the other direction from Walmart and see what is really happening all around us.

While all eyes were on the Washington Township Walmart, self proclaimed patriots were quietly and effectively working on changing the socio-political mood. Perhaps the teen in Walmart felt comfortable singling out black people, because he is aware of adults acting in a similar fashion. Leading the way are the newest members of the patriot movement, members of the Tea Party.

Anyone who believes, or wants you to believe, that this group is more substance than slurs has lost touch with reality as they proudly promote an ideology of intellectual, political, and often, racial supremacy. They appear to believe that anyone who has an opinion or experience different from theirs is a threat. The record clearly shows their belief in the destruction of their enemy not the defeat of their political opponent.

Agendas of racism, sexism and homophobia have often been implemented under the guise of patriotism and religion. Have we so quickly forgotten the original modern-era patriot movement whose most infamous member, Timothy McVeigh, decided to show his disdain for the law by blowing up the Oklahoma City federal building?

Now we have the Tea Party movement, an organization marked by racially inflammatory and violent outbursts since its inception.

Just last week U.S. Rep. John Lewis encountered protesters at a Tea Party rally who began to chant “Kill the bill,” referring to the health care reform bill that was up for its major vote. Lewis turned to the crowd and said that he was supporting the bill, at which point, some began to chant “Kill the Bill, (n-word)” more than 15 times. That exceeds passion and goes straight to racist.
Now I am not suggesting that everyone in the crowd was chanting at Lewis this way, but according to published reports, none of Tea Party members who were not chanting stopped those who were. Later in the week the violence escalated, with protesters shooting into congressional offices, putting bricks through office windows, and threatening bodily harm to those who voted for the health care bill.

What happened to majority rule? It seems that democratic principles go out the window once some members of the long-established majority, suddenly find themselves in the political minority. That is the beginning of a nation divided against itself.

At rallies held to protest Tax Day last year, Tea Partiers carried signs that announced “Obama’s Plan: White Slavery,” as well as “The American Taxpayers are the Jews for Obama’s Oven. Tom Tancredo, a former congressman recently told a Tea Party convention member from Colorado who stated “People who could not spell the word ‘vote’, or say it in English, put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House... .” The problem is that we do not have a civics literacy test before people can vote.”

It should be of astounding concern to all that this individual is advocating for a return to such a precarious era in our nations history, and that he desires us to believe that it has nothing to do with having the nations first non-white president. I do not buy it for a minute and neither should you.

There is a mood of no tolerance toward others being dragged across the landscape by members of the Tea Party. A kid on the intercom at Walmart may be a symptom of the problem, following the lead of others. There are too many good people in this country to allow the words and deeds of a few extremists to take us back 50 years.

Milton W. Hinton Jr. is director of equal opportunity for the Gloucester County government. He is past president of the Gloucester County Branch NAACP. His e-mail address is: milton@Hintonwritesthenation.com. Hinton blogs at www.Hintonwritesthenation.com.

Post 89

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 11:01amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ted, you are kidding right?  This rant is a smear attempt by leftists.

Also Mike, I don't for a second believe anything the Southern Poverty Law Center says they are leftist kooks.  I heard their spokesman call Bill Bennet an extremist when defending the various communists that Obama appointed.  What a joke.

Not that the plot was not cause for concern, but keep in mind they use any and all opportunities to painti anyone who opposes their leftist ideas as an extremist - when it is their ideologies that are extreme.

Also, that so-called yelling was never verified objectively - i.e. there is no objective evidence it ever happened.  It may have, but it is not on tape and we have only the word of people who have cause to want it to be true.

(Edited by Kurt Eichert on 3/30, 11:03am)


Post 90

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 2:20pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Me, kid? Are you implying that this is the wrong forum for moral relativism and arbitrary smear attempts by kooky leftists, Kurt?



Post 91

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 7:50pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
What has mortal relativism got to do with this thread? There has been no alleged sleeping with one's sister. The Walmart store wasn't even in the deep south or Appalachia.

Post 92

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - 8:15pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ain't you seen pixtures of them there suspects in Michael's post?



Post 93

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 - 12:40amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Dean says: woops I accepted some spam from this tosser.
(Edited by Dean Michael Gores on 3/31, 5:56am)


Sanction: 39, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 39, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 39, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 39, No Sanction: 0
Post 94

Friday, April 2, 2010 - 12:36pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Kurt wrote,
Not that the plot was not cause for concern, but keep in mind they use any and all opportunities to paint anyone who opposes their leftist ideas as an extremist - when it is their ideologies that are extreme.
Hey, don't you know that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice, no virtue?

Here is the proper response to an accusation of "extremism":

"If by 'extreme' you mean principled, then I accept your calling me that, even though I find it distasteful. However, if you mean 'too outrageous to take seriously,' then I reject your epithet and call into question your motives. Are you one of those people who think politicians and bureaucrats should be allowed to mess with your life any time they want? Or any time 'the majority' wants? Is the concept of the sovereign individual citizen so unthinkable to you that you consider it 'extreme'? Or are you so defensive about how sloppy a thinker you are that you resent, and are even hostile to, people who strive for intellectual clarity? Or are you just so comfortable in your intellectual mediocrity that you can't be bothered to think about the long-term consequences of your principles or lack thereof, and hate to be challenged to?

"I consider the term 'extremism' to be a word deliberately chosen for its vagueness and used by intellectual slobs who are too desperate, sneaky or lazy to say exactly what they mean. Its only purpose is to deliberately try to confuse the difference between people who are extremely good (usually because of devotion to their principles) with people who are extremely bad. The sleazeballs who use this supposedly scary, yet undefined, word are not only trying to smear people of conviction and integrity, but they're also trying to divert attention away from the fact that they are obviously not people of principle themselves."
-- Rick Gaber

"If an uncompromising stand is to be smeared as 'extremism,' then that smear is directed at any devotion to values, any loyalty to principles, any profound conviction, any consistency, any steadfastness, any passion, any dedication to an unbreached, inviolate truth -- any man of integrity." -- Ayn Rand in " 'Extremism' or The Art of Smearing", Chapter 17 of Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.



Post 95

Friday, April 2, 2010 - 1:28pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Good post Bill - thanks

Post 96

Friday, April 2, 2010 - 2:45pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I suggest posting the above as a quote as well, where it will serve as a handy reference.

Post 97

Thursday, July 29, 2010 - 5:20amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
On the ideological side are some leaders (especially among far-right extremists) who promote the concept of “leaderless resistance.” This idea perhaps was most widely promulgated by former Klansman Louis Beam. In a February 1992 essay, Beam outlines a plan to overhaul the white supremacist movement — calling for the formation of small, autonomous cells that were to be driven by ideology rather than act under the direction of membership groups. Beam’s argument was that this leaderless resistance would have superior operational security and be more successful in conducting attacks than the membership groups, which he believed (correctly) were filled with informants.

Perhaps one of the most prolific, and least known, ideological lone wolf terrorists was neo-Nazi Joseph Paul Franklin, who conducted a string of arsons and shootings from 1977 to 1980 in an effort to spark a race war in the United States. Franklin, who frequently targeted mixed-race couples, killed at least 20 people during his attacks, which by his own account also included failed assassination attempts against Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt and then-National Urban League President Vernon Jordan.

Included in the religious realm are “Phineas Priests,” people who believe they have been chosen by God and set apart to act as his “agents of vengeance” on Earth. Phineas Priests frequently conduct attacks against abortion providers and homosexuals — targets they believe have violated biblical law. Phineas Priests derive their name from Phinehas, an Old Testament character who killed an Israelite man and a Midianite woman and who was credited with stopping the idolatry brought into the midst of the Israelites by Midianite women.

Most Phineas Priests, including Buford Furrow [1] and Eric Rudolph [2], are adherents to the racist and anti-Semitic Christian Identity religion. Christian Identity, however, does not have a monopoly on religiously motivated lone wolves. Radical Roman Catholics like James Kopp [3], Protestants such as Paul Hill and Muslims like Mir Amal Kansi [4] and D.C. Sniper John Allen Muhammad [5] also have committed religiously motivated attacks.

("The Challenge of the Lone Wolf."  more here: http://www.stratfor.com/challenge_lone_wolf   Stratfor -- Strategic Forecasting -- is a news and information source for security and law enforcement professionals.)


Post 98

Sunday, July 24, 2011 - 3:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Not in the USA, of course, but more of the same.

(Reuters) - A Norwegian right-wing fanatic who killed at least 92 people believes his acts were atrocious but necessary, his lawyer said, as the nation mourned victims of its worst attacks since World War Two.
By Victoria Klesty and Gwladys Fouche
SUNDVOLLEN, Norway | Sun Jul 24, 2011 3:12am EDT


(Edited by Michael E. Marotta on 7/24, 3:02am)


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4


User ID Password or create a free account.