| | In posts 44, 45, and 50 Shane Hurren wrote: ... I think it's one thing when someone takes a grant that doesn't have any knowledge of libertarian or objectivist principles, but it is funny when one does and they rationalize how they didn't have a choice, that it is the only way for them to "get by", that there is a gun to their head, or that we don't live in a totally free economy so they just can't properly practice morality. Can we honestly say that the individual who excepts a government grant, and the one who turns it down and makes his/her way in the world without it are equal in strength and nobility? ... But, I think it's important how one gets the money to get there. All I can say is this, when I was in this same position in my life, I turned it down, and said "fuck school." ... I told people why, and they all said the same thing " It's your money too, you're just taking it back..." Well, maybe, but, I don't see it that way. I looked at it as lying down and becoming slavish... Money comes and goes, it's what's inside that creates it. ...
It was not just the large number of looter university folk here sucking down government money that changed my mind. It was Robert Bidinotto's pointing out that there is a distinction between "intrinsic" and "objective."
Among the several kinds of work I do, I now have a part-time job as a security guard at a public college. I also applied for and received government grants for tuition. I am enrolled in a Criminal Justice class (Ethics CJ-250), Philosophy 250 (Logic) and Office Technology 180, "Microsoft Access." My goal is complete an associate's degree in administration so that I can open more opportunities as a secretary than I have without the degree. Along the way, I will fill in some of the undergraduate credits I am lacking and then transfer to a four-year school. The class in criminal justice reflects the career choice in public safety (something else I have done in the recent past) and is a fall-back position.
Long term, I will complete a doctorate, and when I do, I will be ready to do business with the global kleptocracies that Objectivists endorse as being not intrinsically evil. I owe Shane Hurren (and myself, I suppose) an apology.
|
|