| | Orion--didnt you write a SOLO article on Islam? and the contents of the Koran?????
Retire the delusions of grandeur. Galileo, you aint.
And try accepting the proposition that you have nothing but spotty anecdotal evidence for your argument and move on. You aren't going to sway anyone by being nasty and citing the capture of the occasional Muslim spy.
You conclusions are based on whim. You...you....you WORSHIP these WHIMS!!!!!!!!!
YOU WHIM-WORSHIPPER!!!
Anyway, I dispute your groundless accusation that I am looking to spare energy in dealing with militant Islam. Don't know where you got that idea.
But I have acheived my 2 points in engaging you. First, we can confirmed that you are indeed in favor of the wholesale murder of any "Muslim" of any stripe, regardless whether any motive, plan or action indicts them. This is especially interesting because your position here is at odds withe your recent SOLO article "The Non-Initiation of Force," wherein you write:
"Once an enemy expresses the belief that we should be attacked, that is the core... the germ... the want. But when the actual beginning of that want is made easier through actual planning and organizing, then it has been initiated.
At this point, the attack has actually been initiated, and we do not violate our non-initiation of force rule by attacking them."
Oops. Guess you were wrong in that article--no plans necessary. Just membership in a group.
Second, I have confirmed that your BASIS for this genocidal preference of yours is not evidence, but rather isolated anecdotes, gut feeling and a paranoid desire to lash out at any potential aggressor. I'd suggest you re-read your own article.
|
|
