| | Eric,
Someone said, "faith is an agreement with one's self not to learn anything new," which fits most cases. I also like these from the Autonomist Notebook: "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." —Mark Twain
"The most costly of all follies is to believe passionately in the palpably not true. It is the chief occupation of mankind." —H. L. Mencken
Whenever I run across an argument like this for, "faith," Human reasoning will always be insufficient for becoming or being a Christian, for it cannot comprehend what faith perceives and receives, I propose the following question:
Here are two men of faith; one believes in Allah based on what he perceives and receives by faith, and believes so completely he straps explosives to his body and blows himself and as many others as he can to kingdom come. The other believes in a God suffering from multiple personality disorder, (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost), and based on what he perceives and receives by faith, he willingly sacrifices all to that belief. The question is, how does one decide which faith is the right one, since both of these, "believers," got to their faith the same way, that is, without human reason?
That puts you in a position to reject any argument made to justify one faith above another faith by simply saying, "oh, that's just human reason." Even if it does not work, it's fun to watch them squirm.
Regi
|
|