About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, November 15, 2007 - 1:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

 

The jacket illustration is a detail from Time Saving Truth from Falsehood and Envy

by François Lemoyne.

 

Other splendid works by Professor Gaukroger are shown here.



Post 1

Friday, November 16, 2007 - 1:45pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
So what do you think of the book is there a review?  It just says what it is about

Post 2

Friday, November 16, 2007 - 3:34pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

I don't have the book yet. Just learned of it from the recent catalogue OUP sent me. Thought some readers here might like to know about it.

I think Gaukroger's book Explanatory Structures: Concepts of Explanation in Early Physics and Philsophy is excellent, so I'm expecting something really fine from his new book Emergence of a Scientific Culture, written with an additional thirty years of study.



Post 3

Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 10:32amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ok let us know what you think.

Post 4

Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 4:13pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I just go the book from the library.  It will take me a few weeks to get around to it.


Post 5

Friday, November 23, 2007 - 5:21pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I just googled the dude. Be careful - there are two different Stephen Gaukrogers and both have written many books.

One is an English pastor, who writes apologias for Christianity. The other (our boy, here) is an Australian professor of philosophy whose field is the history and philosophy of science.

Post 6

Sunday, November 25, 2007 - 10:01amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
You still need to be careful...
I started reading this and while in the main it is very much as you might expect and comfortably challenging in bringing lots of ideas together there are potential  philosophical problems.  Is it true that science merely replaced religion -- and I do not mean supplanted and certainly not defeated but only became the new justification for western imperialism? 

On a more particular note...  Gaukroger mentioned the discoveries of penicillin and cortisone.  He said that neither of them actually came from a specific programme to find them.  True perhaps but cortisone's history is different from that of penicillin.

Again, I am enjoying the book.  It is a good read, but you need to keep your wits about you.

One of the early threads is Gaukroger's preference for clinical medicine versus research.  Research has done little except turn people into guinea pigs for torture, he said.

It is unfair to pick on the ugly stepsister, of course.  However, following the idea of cortisone, I found this:

In the United States a black market developed which had serious medical and social repercussions. Patients who had experienced great relief of their symptoms were not prepared to relapse when supplies ran out. They became totally dependent on the drug. Overdosage led to devastating side effects, and the ever escalating cost of maintaining their supplies resulted all too often in financial destitution. Such patients had no alternative but to seek relief by registering as guinea pigs to research groups such as the one at the Bellevue Hospital in New York which I joined in 1952.
Eventually, in 1954, under the joint aegis of the Nuffield Foundation and the Medical Research Council, a British trial was organised in six centres in which the benefits of cortisone were studied in 61 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a crossover trial against aspirin. The published results startlingly concluded that there was no significant difference between the two groups (BMJ 1954;i:1223-7).
Philip Hench was deeply offended by these conclusions especially as they were signed by many colleagues whom he had numbered among his greatest friends. Indeed he was heard to refer to some of the signatories as traitors and he refused any further association with them.
I felt that the crossover nature of the trial and some of the methods of evaluation gave rise to an unrealistic conclusion and I imprudently wrote a letter (BMJ 1954;i: 1376). My letter drew an angry reply from Sir Austin Bradford-Hill, the distinguished medical statistician who had designed the trial protocol (BMJ 1954;i:1437). I met him many years later and he graciously agreed that some of my comments were justified in the light of subsequent events.
-- http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7161/822/a


Post 7

Saturday, January 5, 2008 - 11:30amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Six weeks later and two library renewals... this is a dense book.  You can breeze through the narrative.  What about the history of science do you not already know?  But to read the book and to follow the footnotes is a lot of work.  The only strategy for me that will work is keep renewing and reading...


Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Post 8

Wednesday, December 3, 2008 - 12:04amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Looks like a good companion:

 

The Beginnings of Western Science

The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, 600 B.C. to A.D. 1450

David C. Lindberg (Chicago 2008)

 

From the publisher:

When it was first published in 1992, The Beginnings of Western Science was lauded as the first successful attempt ever to present a unified account of both ancient and medieval science in a single volume. Chronicling the development of scientific ideas, practices, and institutions from pre-Socratic Greek philosophy to late-Medieval scholasticism, David C. Lindberg surveyed all the most important themes in the history of science, including developments in cosmology, astronomy, mechanics, optics, alchemy, natural history, and medicine. In addition, he offered an illuminating account of the transmission of Greek science to medieval Islam and subsequently to medieval Europe.

The Beginnings of Western Science was, and remains, a landmark in the history of science, shaping the way students and scholars understand these critically formative periods of scientific development. It reemerges here in a second edition that includes revisions on nearly every page, as well as several sections that have been completely rewritten. For example, the section on Islamic science has been thoroughly retooled to reveal the magnitude and sophistication of medieval Muslim scientific achievement. And the book now reflects a sharper awareness of the importance of Mesopotamian science for the development of Greek astronomy. In all, the second edition of The Beginnings of Western Science captures the current state of our understanding of more than two millennia of science and promises to continue to inspire both students and general readers.

 



Post 9

Monday, April 30, 2012 - 8:03amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

This morning I finally got around to ordering The Beginnings of Western Science by Lindberg (spanning 600 B.C. to A.D. 1450) and The Emergence of a Scientific Culture by Gaukroger (spanning 1210–1685). Since posting the initial notice, I have gotten to learn more of Greek (a, b, c), Arab (a, b, c), and Medieval (a, b, c) philosophy and science. Lately I have been getting reacquainted with early modern philosophy and the science of that period. My initial exposure to early modern philosophy and science had been as an undergraduate over forty years ago. In those decades since then, there has been a tremendous expansion of works in the history of philosophy and science translated into English. My renewed acquaintance of the early modern intellectual period has really been also a lot of new acquaintance.

A great informed and reflective vista, with the up-to-date detail sources I require (for my own best vista), is in a work of Stephen Gaukroger The Collapse of Mechanism and the Rise of Sensibility (2010). It spans 1680–1760. It is a sequel to The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Finding what I needed so perfectly when I dug into Collapse of Mechanism this morning, I decided to order the earlier work and to let you know about this second book of Gaukroger in what is intended to be a series of six books under the arch Science and the Shaping of Modernity.

Although this second in the series
    follows naturally from the story told in the earlier volume, it can nevertheless be read in its own right as an account of the development of a scientific culture in early Enlightenment Europe. I take such a development to be a distinctive and unique feature of Western culture. In many respects it is the characteristic that marks the West out decisively from other cultures, and it is in the period between 1680 and 1760 that the distinctive credentials of this new development began to be established. –Preface



Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.