About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Sunday, November 21, 2004 - 12:43pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Isn't this the collection of writings (except for maybe Think Twice or some others) that Rand did not want to reveal to the public, as she even wrote them in a penname because she knew they were early, developmental and not very good?

Isn't this the collection that Leonard published in defiance of what she would have (justifiably) wished, for monetary gain?

Alec 


Post 1

Sunday, November 21, 2004 - 2:06pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Alec, you are correct that Rand did not want these stories published. However, that does not detract from their value, and people who admire her work are bound to find them fascinating.

Barbara

Post 2

Sunday, November 21, 2004 - 4:48pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Unless Leonard Peikoff specifically agreed to Ayn Rand not to publish these pieces, or, if in designating him as executor of her intellectual property, she put restrictions on his use of this work, I see nothing morally wrong with his publishing them, even if he knew it was not her wish. The decision should be and must be his.

If Peikoff had presented these pieces deceptively as all finished work, I would feel differently; however, in his introduction and his prefaces to each piece, he explains their historical context and the fact, as in the unpublished excerpts from We the Living and The Fountainhead, that some are are not finished works. He explains that some, for example "The Husband I Bought," were done as writing exercises. Others, such as my favorites "Red Pawn" and "Think Twice," are finished products. I, for one, am thrilled that this work exists.

By the way, since I posted this, I've read elsewhere that "Think Twice" has been produced on stage since this collection was first published and I would still love, love, love to see it.


Post 3

Sunday, November 21, 2004 - 4:54pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ms. Branden, I certainly agree with you. It provides us with a look into her developing stages.

Nothing does this more than her Journals. Btw, do you know if she would have approved of their publication? Because notes to one's self are as private as it gets. I'm certainly glad they were published and I devoured them, but I'm wondering if that wasn't another case of Peikovian greed?

Alec


Post 4

Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - 7:28amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'm certainly glad they were published and I devoured them, but I'm wondering if that wasn't another case of Peikovian greed?
I read The Early Ayn Rand and recommended it to my brother and his immediate reply was, "Aren't these the ones that she did not want published?"  So, the question is a known problem.
 
Solutions depend on basic premises and derived truths.  "Dying wish" injunctions can be emotionally powerful.  My wife and I were each commanded by our mothers to take care of our siblings.*  Frankly, we prefer that they take care of themselves, but it is kind of hard to say "No" to Mom, so we deal with that.  The point is that given the relationship between Rand and Peikoff, if he chose to publish the Early works and the Journals, then he did.  If you do not want to buy them, then don't.  Apparently, you did buy them and you did benefit.  I did, too.  The objective reality of the situation is hard to argue.  The dead are metaphysically challenged to carry out their wills, so they have to "live" with our decisions.
 
As for Dr. Peikoff being "greedy," he might accept that as a compliment.  I know that I would!

*My objectivist brother takes care of himself and his family quite well, of course.  On the other hand...
 Likewise, my wife has one efficacious sib and one who is something else. (Just to get that straight.) 


 


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.