About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Tuesday, November 9, 2004 - 9:22pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
In a used books and new comics store, the cover caught my eye and I read the magazine.  I was never a fan of Batman until then, but only then.  I have not kept up with it.  However, as they came out, I bought the first four Dark Knight comics for my wife and put them into plastic bags.  They have performed much better than her equities portfolio.

Batman is one of many superheroes who is human and therefore limited. Success is not guaranteed to him.  (The historical problem with Superman has always been to find challenges he cannot meet.  Multicolored kryptonite was about the best they could do.)  Batman's best moves are always the result of intelligence and insight.  He acts by physical prowess, rather than physical force.  As a middle ager myself -- early then; late now -- I saw in him a model.  Old age is not for sissies. 

I do not know how "fascist" he is, but they call him the Dark Knight for a reason.  In the story, the President has had about enough and they send Superman to bring him in.  Says Batman, "You always were a Boy Scout."

I agree 100% about the artwork and the canon that defines it.  Frank Miller's work is epistemologically integrated -- at least from this reader's perspective; I do not know the man   -- the pictures and the dialog are woven into a story with a plot.


Post 1

Tuesday, November 9, 2004 - 11:39pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael,

Glad to meet a fellow fan... and you know, this very miniseries -- which was originally published in 1984 (a telling year) -- was actually the series that brought Batman back, and was actually the reason for the Michael Keaton movie.  Before this, Batman was a largely camped-out, forgotten character. 

Frank Miller brought him back by literally injecing a heavy dose of Howard Roark into Batman, and made him very Blade-Runner-ish.  The character is utterly self-reliant, sometimes dipping into the realms of paranoid psychosis... which is, of course, part of the territory when you're a person of consummate logic and integrity, surrounded by a world of anti-logic corruption.

After reading The Dark Knight Returns, and when I heard that a Batman movie was being planned, I immediately assumed that the obvious would be done:  that it would be done Frank Miller-style, with the entire Blade Runner sort of feel... complete with rainy streets, music by Vangelis, the whole kit and caboodle.

But noooooo.  Of course, the arrogant, cocaine-linked nepotists of Hollywood had to worship their golden calf, the god "Recent Craze", and give the project to Tim Burton... who, of course, in compliance with the principles of Hollywood nepotism (which also of course override real quality and objectivity), dictated that he cast comedian Michael Keaton as Batman (lousy choice number two), and who would then also pick that composer of circus clown music, Danny Elfman, to do the musical score (lousy choice number three... we have a tri-fecta!).  At least they got Jack Nicholson, which was one right move.

Once you top it all off with a tacky set of songs by Prince, what you're basically left with is an overall package that is the equivalent of taking a public dump at a wedding, and then smearing it on the bride's dress in front of the entire wedding congregation.

But hey, if Hollywood does it, it's automatically right... right?

I mean, they could have hired Ridley Scott (of Blade Runner) to do the directing, who would likely have picked Vangelis to do the musical score (which would have been unbelievably amazing), and Scott might have picked Tom Beringer to play The Dark Knight (Go back and rent the movie Sniper and tell me that Beringer can't play paramilitary, silent, obsessive, and cerebral)...  Imagine Tom Beringer as Batman, opposite Jack Nicholson (or Gene Hackman) as The Joker.  Those would be gritty men, playing a real gut-busting chess game of wits and sheer will against each other. 

Anyhow, now that the vainglorious stumblers-through-the-dark of Hollywood have completely burned the Batman movie opportunity to the ground, they may have learned somewhat from their mistakes.  So they're casting Christian Bale as the new Batman, and the Batmobile is now the tank that it was in Frank Miller's novel.

However, if you ask me, the best film version by far that I've seen yet, was done by an associate Hollywood producer named Sandy Collora, in a seven-minute short he produced to advertise his talents, in a featurette called:  Batman:  Dead End.  The link for the movie is here.   Enjoy:
http://www.theforce.net/theater/shortfilms/batman_deadend/

After you watch it, I'm sure you'll agree that all the other Batman movies thus far have been just plain crap.

(Edited by Orion Reasoner on 11/09, 11:43pm)


Post 2

Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 2:29amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael, Orion,

I agree 100% about the artwork and the canon that defines it.  Frank Miller's work is epistemologically integrated -- at least from this reader's perspective; I do not know the man   -- the pictures and the dialog are woven into a story with a plot.

I don't think Miller is an Objectivist per se, but I believe he does admit a Randian influence of some degree :-)

I have to agree this one terrific graphic novel! Though the dark nature of certain aspects of the plot may be disturbing to some SOLOists, I personally think there is a positive message here, in that the Bruce Wayne we meet at the start of the story is cynical, almost fatalist in his attitude, and morbidly concerned with dying a good death. As he once again takes up the fight against crime, and the corrupt authorities, and eventually Superman, he seems to rediscover a far more positive attitude, and ends realising he can still have a good life.

MH


Post 3

Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 4:05pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'm also a fan of Frank Miller and The Dark Knight Returns as well as its sequel but my favorite Frank Miller work, my favorite Batman comic and my second all time favorite comic book work is Batman: Year One written by Miller with art by David Mazucchelli.
 
So what is my all time favorite comic? Superman: Whatever Happened to the Man of Steel? by Alan Moore, Curt Swan, George Perez, Kurt Schaffenberger and Murphy Anderson. This was a wonderful ending to the silver age Superman's saga before being retooled by John Byrne.


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.