About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Saturday, August 8, 2009 - 1:52amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
So lets give everybody army and governement employees insurance whether they "like" it or not.  Can you get the people to discerne the difference between beri beri and rickets ?
After stumbling across a few blogs about the insurance package, a number of them mentioned some such criteria about after a certain age one would have euthanasia as a viable option to relieve ones suffering. Personally that clause if true is very disturbing. For very obvious reasons.
Insurance is a very basic concept an exercise in speculation. The concept involves a pool of people chipping in a "nickle" to bail out the unfortunates in an untimely event. Unfortunately the lip service involved has eroded the immediate needs of the unfortunate ones enduring there test of survival.
The example of insurance providers, mryiad combinations of coverage and multiple coverage fees leads one to believe that health coverage is not the issue. Attempting to interpret any exposure to the mechinizations of the insurance process makes one wonder why one would sign anything let alone invite the Family Doctor with his satchel in for a meal.  
Weighing the power of superstition, and the challenge of leading some people out of the dark ages with their heritage and sincerity intact one must consider the demographics of all levels of ability involved.   


Post 1

Saturday, August 8, 2009 - 5:57amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
HRB wrote:

Can you get the people to discern the difference between beri beri and rickets?

No more than I get the people to discern the similarity between a Dingell and a dingleberry!

Post 2

Sunday, August 9, 2009 - 1:47pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I couldn't listen to the interview more than a few minutes. I think Dingell may be a very sincere, but certainly completely stupid man.

yuck!

jt

Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Post 3

Sunday, August 9, 2009 - 2:15pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Dingell's not a nice man. Nice men don't take such a dim view of his constituents, thinking them all to be as stupid as one idiotic example, using that one example as an excuse to control  all men. Nice men don't swindle the productive for the sake of the unproductive. He's a classic statist, collectivist, massive evader.  Dingell is no friend of freedom or liberty.  He's a human hater to the core.


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 4

Wednesday, August 12, 2009 - 6:24pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y98HxYbsdBM

Impressive.

The young man talks kinda fast, I had to play it twice to catch it all.


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 5

Thursday, August 13, 2009 - 7:11amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Should have sent her overseas, and him to Washington. Brief, clear, honest, respectful speech. And the audience sure got it, even if the congresswoman didn't.

jt

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.