About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Monday, October 21, 2013 - 7:26pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Steve, My thoughts about that article:

I've always wondered why the Japanese attacked Perl Harbor. Its suspicious that the reason was never taught. I guess the implied reason is just that Perl Harbor was like a military threat to Japan, and Japan felt like the US shouldn't have that threat there. But I'd expect Japan would have asked us to keep our ships and planes away from them. And then maybe we didn't, as the author of that article claims. Anybody here have thoughts/evidence on that?

I think the author is right in saying power is dangerous. But I think he is wrong is concluding that anyone who has power must become corrupt. I think the more true conclusion to come to is that more local power points (such as individuals and local governments) should never let their overarching governments (such as State or even Federal) become more powerful than they are. Central power is dangerous for an entire large system. Distributed power allows for locals to fail while the remainder flourish.

Also, I don't think the President and the rest of Washington DC are trying to get in wars in order to be recognized as war heros. I think they like wars just because it gives them a reason to spend tax money and then cause people to work for their military and military industrial complex and then tax those people too. Career government people just like spending government money in general, it makes more fluff jobs for their friends and more money flows for them to grab.

I was thinking the article would say that the US might go to war because they are bankrupt... in order to confiscate the gold back that they secretly sold to China and India. Because when the world figures out that the US has been lying all these years about how much gold reserves they have, and lying about how they've been safekeeping all these foreign countries gold... well I'm guessing the foreign countries aren't going to be too happy with the US and they might want to take something from us (like land & American's lives) in order to bring restitution and retaliation, and then whatevers left of the US would then be incapacitated for years... So I'd expect the Federal Government forsees that future, and decides to attack India and China to steal back the gold they've secretly been selling them before this happens. So that they can make good on their promise to Germany that in 7 years they will return Germany's deposited amount of gold back to Germany.

Post 21

Monday, October 21, 2013 - 11:32pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I've never agreed with any of the conspiracy theories of the war with Japan - That they had been provoked to the point where they had to attack, or that provocations were done in hopes of getting them to attack us, or that FDR knew of the attack in advance. I do believe we were playing hardball with them in international trade, but remember the context. They were attacking, and invading countries right and left - they were responsible for the Rape of Nanking, killing 300,000 civilians and the stated Japanese policy was "Burn all, Loot all." They captured Canton, Hong Kong, and much of China. They had announced their intention to rule all of East Asia. They were doing in the Pacific what Hitler was doing in Europe. I suspect that they attacked us at Pearl Harbor because they thought that there was no way to avoid a war with us eventually and it being just a matter of time, they thought the sneak attack would cripple our navy bad enough to give them the edge they needed. They seem to feel invincible.

Post 22

Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - 4:02amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Maybury's "The War that will Kill the Dollar" reminded me of a presentation "The Coming Hyperinflation" (link) at this year's Atlas Summit. The speaker showed a slide which shows 30 (all?) historical cases of hyperinflation. Without listening again, I'm confident he doesn't mention war. My comment at the link notes that most (all?) cases were war-related.

Post 23

Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - 8:22amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Wikipedia suggests that,"Hyperinflation is often associated with wars, their aftermath, sociopolitical upheavals, or other crises that make it difficult for the government to tax the population, as a sudden and sharp decrease in tax revenue coupled with a strong effort to maintain the status quo can be a direct trigger of hyperinflation."

I like what the Wikipedia article says about the difficulty collecting taxes and especially coupled with a strong effort to maintain the status quo. That, to me, it the description of the massive denial, fantasy thinking, and evasion that would characterize a government that creates that quantity of fiat currency.

I don't see it requiring a war to get that going. I can imagine something like a financial collapse in California where that state government is no longer able to fund hospitals or pay emergency workers or police. The Fed steps in. The financial markets get super jittery, not just because of California, or its effect on national and global economies, but because they know that even the fed isn't large enough to take that size of a bailout. The fed goes crazy pumping money into the stock-market to keep them from panicking at the same time they are suddenly paying the bills for California. This is that psychology of trying to make things look normal, to have their cake and eat it too.

Add to that mix the progressives who believe in a massive growth in government, who believe that if they could just spend more (maybe 10 times as much?) that it would 'stimulate' us back to health, and who understand and love the fact that a crisis can be used to leverage the transformation of the nation in the direction they want. So, I don't see them as being helpful in stopping inflation as it arrives on the cusp of being hyperinflation.

And, again, it is the psychological aspect of supply and demand that is at work in the steep, rapid, downward spiral in the worth of the dollar. The demand for money drops as people see that it is growing worth less rapidly - first the perception isn't that it IS getting worse, but that all the rumors are that it WILL, and it becomes like a self-fulfilling prophecy (except that there is a consistent reality under the fears). Because it is a psychological effect, this demand for money, in which a massive number of people can express uncertainty and fear by either holding onto money and suddenly taking us into a crash dive to a depression, or they can fear holding onto dollars and make them like hot potatoes. And, at this point in history, and maybe forever, no economist has a tool or technique that will let him predict which way it will go in advance.

Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.