About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 - 4:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I sanctioned the work. 

Almost 40 years ago, I heard Isaac Asimov speak on "The Coming Disappearance of Women."  His topic was really the coming disappearance of social gender roles.  He also quipped that he could have titled it, "The Coming Disappearance of Men" but no one would have showed up to hear about that.  Asimov said that the greatest tool of women's liberation was the typewriter.  For that, he was hissed and booed by some feminists in the audience. He continued, pointing out that the typewriter does not require physical strength, so it robs men of that advantage over women.  The typewriter got women out of the home and liberated them from their traditional roles.  Furthermore, a society based on technology rewards brains rather than muscles. 

The intersection of socialism and women's liberation is interesting.  Historically, liberationists tend to perceive from a wider perspective.  Abolitionists, women's suffragists, and temperance activists mixed with socialists and libertarians.  Obviously, these people held contradictory premises and conclusions.  Not surprisingly, there were glaring inconsistencies.  When Emma Goldman confronted Lenin on the issue of women's rights, he made his point by pouring a glass of water out the window.  Several million murders later equal opportunity had more meaning within a soviet society that was desperate for food, as well as for industrial  production. 

Farming has always been an equal opportunity career.  The 1950s television image of the housewife running a vacuum cleaner while wearing nice clothes (and decorated with a string of pearls) has no place on a farm.  So, historically, before the industrial revolution, the question could never have come up, at least not widely.  Every society allows some leisure and it is true that everyone decorates their artifacts. Even so, it is also true that academic presentations have been focused on male philosophers and artists (and of course generals and politicians).  That may originate in the fact that universities were a function of the church before they were seized by secular philosophers of dubious merit.  It is also true that anyone who cares to do more than sit in class and take notes has no problem discovering Aspasia, Hypatia, Hildegard von Bingen,  or Clara Schumann.   Only after the advent of capitalism, of course, do we actually get everyone off the farm, into the shops, factories, and laboratories -- and allow us all to do something different than countless generations did before us. 

(On a different, but related topic, a capitalist cares more about the color of your money than the color of your skin.)


Post 1

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 - 4:58amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael Marotta wrote:
When Emma Goldman confronted Lenin on the issue of women's rights, he made his point by pouring a glass of water out the window.
I don't get it.  What does the latter have to do with the former?


Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Post 2

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 - 9:23amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
A quote from Camille Paglia on this subject:

"Western technological tradition created the modern, capitalistic life that has allowed the emergence of the feminist.  Our feminist culture at the present moment is completely dependent on capitalism.  My grandmother was still scrubbing clothes on the back porch on a washboard!  My ability to write this book came from this society which men have created.  No other culture has produced feminism but ours.  The idea that western culture is evil--!"


Post 3

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 - 11:18amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Well put, Ricky!

You're right to say that capitalism, far from oppressing gender equality, elevates it. In fact, throughout most of time, women were nearly completely dependent upon marrying a man for security, due to the unavailability of self-supporting careers. It was only through innovation and industrialization that careers opened up, suitable for women, that could earn them enough money to declare independence from the neccesity of marriage.

The word "spinster" illustrates this point beautifully. The origin of the word, the word itself refering to unmarried women of age, came about because the invention of the machine that spins yarn from wool gave so many women the ability to become productive enough to earn their own living, for the first time in history. While capitalism has produced a wide variety of careers, suitable for the modern, independent woman, this old term has stuck, clearly indicating that the economic progression caused by capitalism frees women from financially coerced marriage and servitude.

I believe that most criticisms against capitalism with regard to gender equality don't ackowledge that gender discrimination runs counter-intuitive to capitalism. A man who owns a business and passes up a better qualified woman for a less qualified man, has just injured his business, choosing a poor-quality trade of money for labor over a high quality trade. While this can happen in capitalist systems, it's not the result of capitalism; rather it operates in spite of capitalism and to the detriment of the business owner. The invisible hand of competition will, in the long run, see to it that poorly managed companies don't survive.
Then again, Ronald Reagan once uttered these words of wisdom : "Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it."

-Scott


Post 4

Monday, December 12, 2005 - 1:55pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
And if one ever needed more proof, just look to the millions of women, just like me. Case in point.

Capitalism works for me!


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.