About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - 11:08pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Some further background on Norman Rockwell from my own experiences.  I spent the past two and a half years in Western Massachusetts where Norman Rockwell worked for some time before moving to Southern Vermont.  His major subjects are what you might call middle class small town Americans.  The majority of the places he depicts in his paintings are actually real places; I have been to a good many of them simply by living in the area.  Although Norman Rockwell unlike Bryan Larsen is not what one would call a romantic realist.  Rockwell preferred to show Americans of his time period as he saw them: hardworking, dedicated, patriotic, perhaps sometimes a busybody but overall good down to earth people.  In short perhaps you can say that Norman Rockwell created the image of America: apple pies, baseball and small town main streets.

In my time spent in New England I was privy to see and meet Jarvis Rockwell, the son of the late Norman Rockwell, at the showing of his pyramid of toy action figures.  Like most of the artists of Western Massachusetts, Jarvis, is a post-modernist.  It is sad to see that any talent that may have been relayed from father to son has gone to waste.  Today, Jarvis amongst other burnt out old hippies hide in their art enclaves in the mountains of Western Massachusetts visited only by the most avant-garde of New York City’s art people.  They hide in the mountains showing each other their latest abominations, where once a great painter lived.

 

Truly,

 
Eric J. Tower


Sanction: 1, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Friday, March 12, 2004 - 11:33amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The irony is that Jarvis is considered an "artist", while debate still goes on as to whether or not Norman was an artist, or merely an "illustrator" ~ 

Post 2

Friday, March 12, 2004 - 3:52pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

I find it interesting that many contemporary painters might create exactly the same picture, and intend it to mean the opposite: make it into a humorous or malicious sneer at the gentleman depicted. In fact, so soaked am I in our cultural atmosphere that that was my first reaction to this painting.


Sanction: 2, No Sanction: 0
Post 3

Friday, March 12, 2004 - 7:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Eric wrote,
"We can only judge his face by his stern at attention stance that suggests a stoic look of horror having finally viewed the art that all the critics have been raving about."

If I recall correctly, Norman Rockwell refused to say what his Connoisseur was thinking, but I don't think it's safe to assume that he is reacting with the horror that Eric suggests. People have interpreted the image in many different ways -- that Rockwell may have been poking fun at the pretentiousness of art critics and connoisseurs (of all persuasions, not just modernism), that Rockwell was conveying his own indecisiveness toward modern art, that he was embracing change or even expressing admiration for modern art, etc. In the January 13, 1962 issue of the Saturday Evening Post (on whose cover The Connoisseur appeared) Rockwell was quoted by the editors as having said, "If I were young now I might paint that way myself. Recently I attended some classes in modern art techniques. I learned a lot and loved it."

Jonathan


Post 4

Saturday, March 13, 2004 - 10:39amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
On thinking it over, I agree with Jonathan. Rockwell is wittily observing the gentleman's reaction, certainly, but not with any implication that he, Rockwell, is against nonrepresentational painting. Nor is he poking anything but the gentlest of fun at the gentleman shown.

Rockwell is an amused, good-natured observer of humanity. The wider philosophical implications of nonrepresentationalism would have been over his head.

Not that he is not an artist (in addition to being a professional illustrator). He does transmit a metaphysics, values, and a sense of life, and there is a lot in his work that Objectivists can praise.

PS: I take this opportunity to invite readers to listen to my paean to Halley's Comet in the General Forum.


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.